500 CS instead of 2509 or 2511

From: Bryan Long \(Richmond VA\) (bryaninrichmond@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Aug 30 2001 - 19:18:28 GMT-3

• Next message: Ron Carithers: "RE: nat by destination"
• Previous message: Mark Stover: "RE: Bomber Jacket"
• Next in thread: Bryan Long \(Richmond VA\): "Re: 500 CS instead of 2509 or 2511"
• Maybe reply: Bryan Long \(Richmond VA\): "Re: 500 CS instead of 2509 or 2511"
• Maybe reply: Bill Cropper: "Re: 500 CS instead of 2509 or 2511"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Has anyone used the 500 CS as their terminal server as opposed to the 2509 or
2511? Or if anyone has advice that would be great.

Thanks!!

Bryan
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html

• Next message: Ron Carithers: "RE: nat by destination"
• Previous message: Mark Stover: "RE: Bomber Jacket"
• Next in thread: Bryan Long \(Richmond VA\): "Re: 500 CS instead of 2509 or 2511"
• Maybe reply: Bryan Long \(Richmond VA\): "Re: 500 CS instead of 2509 or 2511"
• Maybe reply: Bill Cropper: "Re: 500 CS instead of 2509 or 2511"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:01 GMT-3