From: Ferguson,Steven (sferguson@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Aug 01 2001 - 22:09:52 GMT-3
Most likely you have summarized it to the wrong prefix length (assuming you
are working with RIPv1). Can you post your config?
Steven
-----Original Message-----
From: Shane Miles
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: 8/1/01 3:44 PM
Subject: area range
What effect does the "area range" command have on
redistribution?
I'm having a weird problem. I have two OSPF areas 0 and 1. I'm
redistributing OSPF routes into BGP. All routes from area 0 and 1 then
get
sent to an EBGP peer where I am redistributing into RIPv1. Everything
works great until I do "area 1 range 16.0.0.0 255.0.0.0". At this point
I
still have good routes all the way to the EBGP peer's route table but
for
some reason it refuses to redistribute it into RIP. I remove the "area
range" command and it all works again. Why should the area range
command
have this effect at this point. At this point its just BGP
redistributing
into RIPv1 isn't it? Ideas?
-- Shane P. Miles **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:43 GMT-3