From: Shane Miles (smiles@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Aug 01 2001 - 16:44:32 GMT-3
What effect does the "area range" command have on redistribution?
I'm having a weird problem. I have two OSPF areas 0 and 1. I'm
redistributing OSPF routes into BGP. All routes from area 0 and 1 then get
sent to an EBGP peer where I am redistributing into RIPv1. Everything
works great until I do "area 1 range 16.0.0.0 255.0.0.0". At this point I
still have good routes all the way to the EBGP peer's route table but for
some reason it refuses to redistribute it into RIP. I remove the "area
range" command and it all works again. Why should the area range command
have this effect at this point. At this point its just BGP redistributing
into RIPv1 isn't it? Ideas?
-- Shane P. Miles **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:43 GMT-3