From: Roman Rodichev (rodic000@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jul 01 2001 - 22:27:11 GMT-3
Thanks Garry.
I think you are right. The destination router will have no way of figuring
out to which tunnel interface GRE packet came to.
>From: garry baker <fallow46@yahoo.com>
>To: Roman Rodichev <rodic000@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: two tunnels
>Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 18:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
>
>Roman,
>
>I may be wrong here, but i think i remember someone
>posting something here a while ago saying that
>multicast won't work with tunnels. i have never tried
>it so i am just repeating something i think i remember
>seeing in a post.
>
>Garry
>--- Roman Rodichev <rodic000@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm having some problems with setting up two GRE
> > tunnels between two
> > routers. I create two tunnel interfaces with source
> > Serial0 and destination
> > as the address of another router. I have EIGRP
> > running on one of the tunnels
> > and IGRP on another of the tunnels. No networks
> > would get advertised across.
> > Eigrp neighbor relationship wouldn't get installed.
> > If I shut down one of
> > the tunnels, EIGRP (or IGRP) will start working.
> > (Autonomous Systems are
> > different)
> >
> > Is anyone aware why this wouldn't work? In reality
> > GRE packets will have
> > source and destination the same for both of the
> > tunnels. But then I would
> > think the destination router would unpack the actual
> > IP packet with source
> > and destination of the real tunnel interfaces. ?
> >
> > Roman
> >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:28 GMT-3