From: Brian (signal@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jul 01 2001 - 23:16:48 GMT-3
I bet that is correct. You could use neighbor statments to force unicast
perhaps. I know that alot of labs with GRE tunnels will run RIPv2 over
them as opposed to EIGRP
Brian
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Roman Rodichev wrote:
> Thanks Garry.
>
> I think you are right. The destination router will have no way of figuring
> out to which tunnel interface GRE packet came to.
>
>
> >From: garry baker <fallow46@yahoo.com>
> >To: Roman Rodichev <rodic000@hotmail.com>
> >Subject: Re: two tunnels
> >Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 18:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >Roman,
> >
> >I may be wrong here, but i think i remember someone
> >posting something here a while ago saying that
> >multicast won't work with tunnels. i have never tried
> >it so i am just repeating something i think i remember
> >seeing in a post.
> >
> >Garry
> >--- Roman Rodichev <rodic000@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > I'm having some problems with setting up two GRE
> > > tunnels between two
> > > routers. I create two tunnel interfaces with source
> > > Serial0 and destination
> > > as the address of another router. I have EIGRP
> > > running on one of the tunnels
> > > and IGRP on another of the tunnels. No networks
> > > would get advertised across.
> > > Eigrp neighbor relationship wouldn't get installed.
> > > If I shut down one of
> > > the tunnels, EIGRP (or IGRP) will start working.
> > > (Autonomous Systems are
> > > different)
> > >
> > > Is anyone aware why this wouldn't work? In reality
> > > GRE packets will have
> > > source and destination the same for both of the
> > > tunnels. But then I would
> > > think the destination router would unpack the actual
> > > IP packet with source
> > > and destination of the real tunnel interfaces. ?
> > >
> > > Roman
> > >
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:28 GMT-3