From: Kent Noyes (kentnoyes@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jun 17 2001 - 20:17:24 GMT-3
I had no problem with the processor. I'll have to check the release but I
know I'm using 12.0 on a 4000.
In referencing to your comments:
8. Yes, it looks like they implemented the solution on R1 and R2.
Could the 'DLSW' keyword have been used in this queue-list instead of tcp
port 2065?
9. I see how the solution raises the priority of sap 4 but how were the rest
of the requirements for this question satisfied (response frames, all SNA
data prioritized over other data)? And why were the other dlsw ports
(1981,1982, and 1983) used in the priority-list?
Also, instead of using a sap-priority-list would the following solution
work?
access-list 201 permit 0x0404 0x0001
access-list 202 permit 0x0500 0x0D0D
priority-list 1 protocol bridge high list 201
priority-list 1 protocol bridge medium list 202
priority-list 1 default normal
11. Is the SAP filter correct in the solution for this one? It appears to
use 0x0000 0x0D0D instead of 0xF0F0 0x0001 to filter NetBIOS.
Thanks,
Kent Noyes
----Original Message Follows----
From: Brian <signal@shreve.net>
Reply-To: Brian <signal@shreve.net>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject: Fatkid 441 Advanced DLSW
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:40:51 -0500 (CDT)
Is it just me, or does Fatkid 441 have a way
of making your R4 (2513) goto 97% processor
load once its all complete. I guess DLSW
really can give a workout.........I have
double checked my configs, so I am pretty
sure this shouldn't just be me. I am running
12.0.17.
Some more comments about this lab. Step 8 says:
8. Configure prioritization between routers R5 and R1 such that SNA
traffic gets at least 50 percent of the available bandwidth sampled
every 0.125 seconds.
But in the solution it appears they did R1 to R2, rather than R1 to
R5..........
Also, step 9:
9. Configure prioritization between R1 and R4. This should prioritize
SNA Control data (SAP 04) and the response frames over other SNA
data. And all SNA data should be prioritized over other data.
I see on R4 where they defined the sap-priority-list, but I don't think
they applied it in the solution, I am assuming it should go on the token
interface.
How good of a DLSW lab is this would you all say? I am trying
to work on weak areas, and DLSW is one of them. I am looking
for more DLSW challenges, and if anyone knows sources
I am sure we could all use some.
Brian
-----------------------------------------------
Brian Feeny e:signal@shreve.net
CCNP+Voice/ATM/Security p:318.222.2638x109
CCDP f:318.221.6612
Network Administrator
ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:25 GMT-3