From: ElleJf\(Yahoo\) (ellejf@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jun 07 2001 - 10:14:49 GMT-3
That should work! I think mutual redistribution is required when there is mult
iple redistribution points.
In face, you can use a single route-map
route-map tagging deny 10
match tag 100
route-map tagging permit 20
set tag 100
router ospf 1
redistribute rip subnets metric 100 route-map tagging
router rip
version 2
redistribute ospf 1 metric 2 route-map tagging
The logic is that we can seperate the routes in OSPF domain as internal (no tag
) and external (tag 100). Because tag in OSPF routes will not influence the ro
utes in RIP2, vice versa, you can set both tag as 100. Harder to understand, t
hough.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of Guy Farb
er
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 5:57 PM
To: Claude-Vincent; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Mutual Redistribution
Right but I'm trying to think about lab situations (6 days to go...)where a
large number of routes may be injected into my network. With distribute-list
out I'll need to type in all relevant networks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Claude-Vincent [mailto:claude_vincent@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thu, June 07, 2001 9:47 AM
To: Guy Farber; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Mutual Redistribution
Guy,
Try to get used to distribute-list out. It's more
flexible.
Claude-Vincent Perez
CCIE# 7914, CCNP, CCDP
--- Guy Farber <gfarber@cisco.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to find a quick and painless way to do
> filtering on mutual
> redistribution points in the lab. Is this filter
> considered proper?
>
> router ospf 1
> redistribute rip subnets metric 100 route-map r2o
>
> router rip
> version 2
> redistribute ospf 1 metric 2 route-map o2r
>
> route-map r2o deny
> match tag 110
> route-map r2o permit 20
> set tag 120
>
> route-map o2r deny
> match tag 120
> route-map o2r permit 20
> set tag 110
>
> TIA
>
> Guy
> **Please
> read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:20 GMT-3