From: Luke (luke.mendoza@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jun 07 2001 - 11:29:55 GMT-3
I think you should filter routes with route-map/distribute-lists when you
are doing redistribution period. This way you are able to control which
routes gets redistributed. This is more evident when redistributing
connected/static.
my 2 cents...
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
ElleJf(Yahoo)
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 6:15 AM
To: Guy Farber
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Mutual Redistribution
That should work! I think mutual redistribution is required when there is
multiple redistribution points.
In face, you can use a single route-map
route-map tagging deny 10
match tag 100
route-map tagging permit 20
set tag 100
router ospf 1
redistribute rip subnets metric 100 route-map tagging
router rip
version 2
redistribute ospf 1 metric 2 route-map tagging
The logic is that we can seperate the routes in OSPF domain as internal (no
tag) and external (tag 100). Because tag in OSPF routes will not influence
the routes in RIP2, vice versa, you can set both tag as 100. Harder to
understand, though.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of Guy
Farber
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 5:57 PM
To: Claude-Vincent; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Mutual Redistribution
Right but I'm trying to think about lab situations (6 days to go...)where a
large number of routes may be injected into my network. With distribute-list
out I'll need to type in all relevant networks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Claude-Vincent [mailto:claude_vincent@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thu, June 07, 2001 9:47 AM
To: Guy Farber; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Mutual Redistribution
Guy,
Try to get used to distribute-list out. It's more
flexible.
Claude-Vincent Perez
CCIE# 7914, CCNP, CCDP
--- Guy Farber <gfarber@cisco.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to find a quick and painless way to do
> filtering on mutual
> redistribution points in the lab. Is this filter
> considered proper?
>
> router ospf 1
> redistribute rip subnets metric 100 route-map r2o
>
> router rip
> version 2
> redistribute ospf 1 metric 2 route-map o2r
>
> route-map r2o deny
> match tag 110
> route-map r2o permit 20
> set tag 120
>
> route-map o2r deny
> match tag 120
> route-map o2r permit 20
> set tag 110
>
> TIA
>
> Guy
> **Please
> read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:20 GMT-3