From: Yasser Mousa (ymousa@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jun 02 2001 - 13:59:13 GMT-3
I did put this command on all the 3 routers
I am using PIM dense
when I enter the command ip pim nbma-mode , it gives me this output
PIM nbma-mode is not recommended for dense-mode
but it accepts it in the config
and it still does not work
any suggestions ?
thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Roman Rodichev [mailto:rodic000@hotmail.com]
Sent: 02 June 2001 18:49
To: ymousa@cisco.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Multicast Over NBMA
ip pim nbma-mode
>From: "Yasser Mousa" <ymousa@cisco.com>
>Reply-To: "Yasser Mousa" <ymousa@cisco.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Multicast Over NBMA
>Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 18:41:32 +0200
>
>Hi all
>
>I am configuring multicast PIM over NBMA,
>
>R1 hub router , joining group 224.1.1.1
>R2 spoke router,joining group 224.2.2.2
>R3 spoke royter ,joining group 224.3.3.3
>
>
>the status is :
>
>R1 can ping 224.2.2.2 , 224.3.3.3
>R2 can ping 224.1.1.1 ONLY
>R3 can ping 224.1.1.1 ONLY
>
>so the 2 spokes cant ping the join groups of eachother,
>is there any issues for multicast over NBMA like ospf ?
>
>thanks in advance
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>Bob Dixon
>Sent: 02 June 2001 18:19
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Fw: PC used in the lab
>
>
>I would think that you should practice using only one window and jumping
>between sessions. My reasoning is that if multiple telnet sessions are
>allowed, then you can easily adapt (using multiple windows would be easier
>for me). If it is not allowed, then you are already familiar with the one
>window (Hyperterm) approach. It would be a bit of an adjustment if I had
>always practiced with multiple telnet sessions, then in the lab I am forced
>to use Hyperterm or only one telnet session.
>
>My 2 cents,
>Bob
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Bob Chahal <bob.chahal@ntlworld.com>
> > To: McCallum, Robert <Robert.McCallum@let-it-be-thus.com>;
> > <andrew.waldwyn@bt.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 11:59 AM
> > Subject: Re: PC used in the lab
> >
> >
> > > True!
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "McCallum, Robert" <Robert.McCallum@let-it-be-thus.com>
> > > To: <andrew.waldwyn@bt.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 4:39 PM
> > > Subject: RE: PC used in the lab
> > >
> > >
> > > > Damn fine question actually. I would be interested in the answer to
> > this
> > > > BUT is it a bit close to the NDA. Being nit picky you could say if
>we
> > get
> > > > an answer to this then someone has just told us something about the
>lab.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dodgy! ;->
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: andrew.waldwyn@bt.com [mailto:andrew.waldwyn@bt.com]
> > > > Sent: 02 June 2001 16:11
> > > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > Subject: PC used in the lab
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Folks,
> > > >
> > > > Is the PC used in the lab on a lan with the terminal server?
> > > > In other words, do we have the ability to have as many device
>windows
>/
> > > > sessions open simultaneously, by telnetting to the relevant device
> > hanging
> > > > off the terminal server or is the connectivity between the PC and
>the
> > > > terminal server just via the console port / COM1 in which case we're
> > > limited
> > > > to having 1 session open and having to jump between device sessions.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance
> > > >
> > > > Andy
> > > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> > > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> > > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:17 GMT-3