From: cao lingwei (caolw@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue May 22 2001 - 05:00:14 GMT-3
because i know "protocol dlsw" is wrong.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Haohong Lin" <hhlin@szskzj.com>
To: "cao lingwei" <caolw@fosco.com.cn>
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: Is that right?help
> Hi, Cao lingWei
>
> Do you know the correct answer?
> why use 'list 101' instead of 'protocol dlsw'?
> the byte counts is correct?
>
> thank you
>
> Haohong Lin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> ???: "cao lingwei" <caolw@fosco.com.cn>
> ???: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> ????: 2001?5?22? 14:04
> ??: Fw: Is that right?help
>
>
> In my practice lab,there is a question:
> in serial interface's traffic:
> dlsw 50%
> ip 25%
> ipx 25%
> dlsw packet fixed size 512
> ipx packet fixed size 1024
> ip packet fixed size 256
>
> My answer:
> access-list 101 permit tcp any eq 2065 any
> access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 2065
> access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 2067
> access-list 101 permit tcp any any 1981
> access-list 101 permit tcp any any 1982
> access-list 101 permit tcp any any 1983
> access-list 101 permit udp any eq 0 any
> access-list 101 permit ip any 224.0.10.0 0.0.0.255
>
> queue-list 1 protocol ip 1 list 101
> queue-list 1 protocol ip 2
> queue-list 1 protocol ipx 3
> queue-list 1 queue 1 byte 2048
> queue-list 1 queue 2 byte 1024
> queue-list 1 queue 3 byte 1024
>
> Is that right?
> I have some other questions?
> In dlsw traffic,how many typies traffics are there?
> In customer-queue default queue is in queue 1
> ,should I write it in configuration?
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:48 GMT-3