Re: Is that right?help

From: Haohong Lin (hhlin@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed May 23 2001 - 09:51:54 GMT-3


   
Hi,

   Thank you, Lachlan.

    Cao didn't use priority bandwidth management, so dlsw would use tcp port
2065/2067, not 1981/1982/1983. another thing, according to dlsw v2(rfc
2166), dlsw should use udp port 2067 for address resolution and netbios
broadcasts, you didn't mention about it.

regards,

Haohong Lin

----- Original Message -----
???: "Lachlan Kidd" <lkidd@netstarnetworks.com>
???: "cao lingwei" <caolw@fosco.com.cn>; "Haohong Lin" <hhlin@szskzj.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
????: 2001?5?22? 17:01
??: RE: Is that right?help

Hi Guys,
>From the doco CD
http://127.0.0.1:8080/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/qos_r/qrcmda.
htm#xtocid1227891
'The dlsw, rsrb, and stun keywords refer only to direct encapsulation.'
For those looking on the web, it's in the 12.0 QOS command reference Under
'prioroty-list'
So if running DLSW over TCP then you have to do it on a port by port basis.
Again from the doco CD
'queue-number' Number of the queue. Any number from 1 to 16. The default
number of the queue list is queue number 1.

HTH,
Lachlan

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of cao
lingwei
Sent: Tuesday, 22 May 2001 6:00:PM
To: Haohong Lin; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Is that right?help

because i know "protocol dlsw" is wrong.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Haohong Lin" <hhlin@szskzj.com>
To: "cao lingwei" <caolw@fosco.com.cn>
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: Is that right?help

> Hi, Cao lingWei
>
> Do you know the correct answer?
> why use 'list 101' instead of 'protocol dlsw'?
> the byte counts is correct?
>
> thank you
>
> Haohong Lin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> ???: "cao lingwei" <caolw@fosco.com.cn>
> ???: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> ????: 2001?5?22? 14:04
> ??: Fw: Is that right?help
>
>
> In my practice lab,there is a question:
> in serial interface's traffic:
> dlsw 50%
> ip 25%
> ipx 25%
> dlsw packet fixed size 512
> ipx packet fixed size 1024
> ip packet fixed size 256
>
> My answer:
> access-list 101 permit tcp any eq 2065 any
> access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 2065
> access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 2067
> access-list 101 permit tcp any any 1981
> access-list 101 permit tcp any any 1982
> access-list 101 permit tcp any any 1983
> access-list 101 permit udp any eq 0 any
> access-list 101 permit ip any 224.0.10.0 0.0.0.255
>
> queue-list 1 protocol ip 1 list 101
> queue-list 1 protocol ip 2
> queue-list 1 protocol ipx 3
> queue-list 1 queue 1 byte 2048
> queue-list 1 queue 2 byte 1024
> queue-list 1 queue 3 byte 1024
>
> Is that right?
> I have some other questions?
> In dlsw traffic,how many typies traffics are there?
> In customer-queue default queue is in queue 1
> ,should I write it in configuration?
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:49 GMT-3