From: Bob Chahal (bob.chahal@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun May 20 2001 - 15:42:57 GMT-3
Well if you're talking about OSPF then why not just go with ospf demand
circuit. The pvc goes down, you lose the route via frame relay, the routes
via the demand circuit then go into the routing table and the circuit is
effectively backed up. No?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Theodore TZEVELEKIS" <theodore_tzevelekis@yahoo.com>
To: "Bob Chahal" <bob.chahal@ntlworld.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2001 7:17 PM
Subject: RE: dlci nackup
> I have thought about dialer watch. However, if you run ospf
> over the BRI, the route that you watch will probably be
> reinstated once the BRI is up, and then the BRI will go back
> down, only to come back up as soon as the route is expired
> again.
>
> In other words, with dialer watch you'll end up with a
> flapping backup interface.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Chahal [mailto:bob.chahal@ntlworld.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2001 8:16 PM
> To: Theodore TZEVELEKIS; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: dlci nackup
>
>
> Dialer watch springs to mind and there has been some debate
> whether this
> works with OSPF or not and Cisco do have some guidelines.
> Best thing to do
> is search the archives for Dialer watch.
>
> Bob
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Theodore TZEVELEKIS" <theodore_tzevelekis@yahoo.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2001 6:50 PM
> Subject: dlci nackup
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > How can one backup a single DLCI to a BRI.
> >
> > For example you have a serial with one or more dlci's
> > configured. If the DLCI is killed from the other side, you
> > want to back it up with the BRI. However, if you use the
> > backup interface command on the main interface, as the
> > latter does not go down (unless it is a subint, but I
> don't
> > want to use subints), backup does not work.
> >
> > TO make myself clear: If the DLCI goes down, the main
> > interface still stays up so backup does not work.
> > I'm looking for a wat to backup on a per DLCI basis.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Theo
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:46 GMT-3