From: Roman Rodichev (rodic000@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat May 19 2001 - 23:51:44 GMT-3
People, am I being stupid? I will take a look at that lab on Tuesday. I
clearly remember that they explicitly said not to use "ip ospf network"
statement.
Yes, you guys are right that we weren't allowed to use "frame map"
statements on the spokes. And it's ok. That was not the point of the lab.
The point was that we couldn't use "ip ospf network multipoint" statement,
which would fix the entire scenario by creating /32 routes on the spokes
pointing to the hub. So since we couldn't do it, we had to create policy
routing that would send traffic to the hub manually.
Am I right?
>From: Martin Duggan <Martin.Duggan@ntl.com>
>Reply-To: Martin Duggan <Martin.Duggan@ntl.com>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP - Policy routing
>Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 21:40:14 +0100
>
>Hi Roman
>
>My understanding of Lab1 was that you policy route as you are not permitted
>to add multiple frame relay map statements from spoke to spoke, you policy
>route so that the next hop is actually your hub ( when attempting to reach
>a
>spoke from a spoke )the hub is obviously aware of all spokes.
>
>Martin
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Roman Rodichev [mailto:rodic000@hotmail.com]
>Sent: 19 May 2001 21:13
>To: kenyeo@email.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP - Policy routing
>
>
>Ken, policy routing should be used when you can't achieve certain task with
>the routing protocol you have or WAN technology you are using. And of
>course, when you are asked to use it. Let's say you have multipoint
>frame-relay, and you can't use "ip ospf network" statement. The only way to
>achieve routing between FR spokes is to use policy-routing.
>
>by the way, this is from Lab1 of ccbootcamp, so I'm not violating NDA. NDA
>is f...ing scary nowadays
>
>
> >From: "Ken Yeo" <kenyeo@email.com>
> >Reply-To: "Ken Yeo" <kenyeo@email.com>
> >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: Redistributing OSPF into IGRP - Policy routing
> >Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 12:59:50 -0500
> >
> >Is policy routing allowed for the lab?
> >
> >The reason I ask is because policy routing essentially bypass routing
>table
> >and it behave like static route, only it depends on source address
>instead
> >of destination address.
> >
> >Policy routing can solve a lot of problem, especially redistributing VLSM
> >OSPF routes into IGRP with same major network.
> >
> >What is your thought?
> >
> >Thanks!
> >
> >Ken Yeo
> >**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:45 GMT-3