From: Johnny Dedon (johnny.dedon@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed May 09 2001 - 16:30:48 GMT-3
Tariq,
I think the solution would be to bridge over the WAN and make one DLSW peer
from R1 to R2 with R2 and R3 being bridged together. Will this solution fit
the other requirements?
Johnny Dedon
Senior Staff Consultant
Exodus Professional Services
johnny.dedon@exodus.net
www.exodus.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tariq Sharif" <tariq_sharif@btinternet.com>
To: "Ccielab@Groupstudy. Com" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 1:37 PM
Subject: DLSw+ "Inverse ARP"??
> Practice lab asks for providing full DLSw+ connectivity between R2 & R3.
And
> between the ring & Lan1 & 2 but by only using ONE peer statement at R1
> (can't use border peers or promis)
>
> ring--R1---WAN---R2--WAN--R3
> | |
> | LAN1 LAN2
>
> Is there anything like Inverse ARP in DLSw+? So if I do a single DLS
remote
> peer statement on R1 with R2 as remote peer, will this provide R3
> connectivity between R1 & R3? I've got it setup like this but don't know
how
> to see if it works (don't have PCs etc)
>
> Many thanks & regards.
>
> Tariq Sharif
>
> [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which
had a name of winmail.dat]
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:37 GMT-3