From: fwells12 (fwells12@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed May 09 2001 - 16:47:37 GMT-3
Why can't you use promiscuous on R1?
----- Original Message -----
From: Tariq Sharif <tariq_sharif@btinternet.com>
To: Ccielab@Groupstudy. Com <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 11:37 AM
Subject: DLSw+ "Inverse ARP"??
> Practice lab asks for providing full DLSw+ connectivity between R2 & R3.
And
> between the ring & Lan1 & 2 but by only using ONE peer statement at R1
> (can't use border peers or promis)
>
> ring--R1---WAN---R2--WAN--R3
> | |
> | LAN1 LAN2
>
> Is there anything like Inverse ARP in DLSw+? So if I do a single DLS
remote
> peer statement on R1 with R2 as remote peer, will this provide R3
> connectivity between R1 & R3? I've got it setup like this but don't know
how
> to see if it works (don't have PCs etc)
>
> Many thanks & regards.
>
> Tariq Sharif
>
> [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which
had a name of winmail.dat]
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:37 GMT-3