From: Padhu (LFG) (padhu@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri May 04 2001 - 15:41:31 GMT-3
Is this so bad ? I just bought it ..Haven't thumbed thro the pges yet ...
I'd appreciate any feedback on this so that i don't waste time doing this.
Cheers,Padhu
-----Original Message-----
From: chris@pacinter.net [mailto:chris@pacinter.net]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 1:41 PM
To: Virnoche, Phil; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Hutnik and Slattery Second Edition OSPF lab
i have a idea, buy a different book
----- Original Message -----
From: "Virnoche, Phil" <phil.virnoche@attws.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 11:16 AM
Subject: Hutnik and Slattery Second Edition OSPF lab
> Hey folks-
>
> First off, I want to vent a little,..... this "new" book is SOOOO full of
> mistakes!!! I can't believe someone could put out a book like this with
> these amount of mistakes! Do they not proof read???
>
> Here is my question... On the OSPF lab on R6, I am trying to get 2 summary
> routes (summary-address 152.1.2.0 255.255.255.0 and summary-address
> 152.1.1.0 255.255.255.0) into the IGRP domain... I have it configured
"just
> like the book says" but to no avail..... relevent configs and debugs
follow:
>
> Any ideas?
>
>
> router ospf 64
> log-adjacency-changes
> auto-cost reference-bandwidth 900
> area 0 authentication message-digest
> area 1 authentication
> area 1 virtual-link 152.1.2.5 message-digest-key 1 md5 cisco0
> area 2 nssa
> summary-address 152.12.0.0 255.252.0.0
> summary-address 152.1.2.0 255.255.255.0
> summary-address 152.1.1.0 255.255.255.0
> redistribute igrp 64 metric 1000
> network 152.1.1.78 0.0.0.0 area 2
> network 152.1.10.2 0.0.0.0 area 1
> network 152.1.11.1 0.0.0.0 area 2
> network 152.1.12.1 0.0.0.0 area 2
> default-information originate always
> distribute-list 1 in Serial0
> !
> router igrp 64
> redistribute ospf 64 route-map summary
> passive-interface BRI0
> passive-interface Loopback0
> passive-interface Loopback1
> passive-interface Serial0
> network 152.1.0.0
> distribute-list 2 in Ethernet0
>
> r6#deb ip igrp trans
> IGRP protocol debugging is on
> r6#sh ip rou
> Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
> N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
> E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
> i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter
> area
> * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
> P - periodic downloaded static route
>
> Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> 152.1.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 8 subnets, 5 masks
> O 152.1.1.128/25 [110/1030] via 152.1.10.1, 19:51:02, Serial0
> C 152.1.11.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0
> C 152.1.10.0/26 is directly connected, Serial0
> C 152.1.12.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback1
> O IA 152.1.1.0/25 [110/1612] via 152.1.10.1, 19:51:02, Serial0
> C 152.1.0.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0
> O 152.1.2.0/30 [110/1021] via 152.1.10.1, 19:51:02, Serial0
> O 152.1.2.4/32 [110/1022] via 152.1.10.1, 19:51:03, Serial0
> I 152.12.0.0/16 [100/1600] via 152.1.0.2, 00:00:50, Ethernet0
> I 152.13.0.0/16 [100/1600] via 152.1.0.2, 00:00:50, Ethernet0
> I 152.14.0.0/16 [100/1600] via 152.1.0.2, 00:00:50, Ethernet0
> I 152.15.0.0/16 [100/1600] via 152.1.0.2, 00:00:50, Ethernet0
> O 152.12.0.0/14 is a summary, 19:50:54, Null0
> r6#
> *Mar 1 20:29:55.526: IGRP: sending update to 255.255.255.255 via
Ethernet0
> (152 .1.0.1)
> *Mar 1 20:29:55.534: subnet 152.1.11.0, metric=501
> *Mar 1 20:29:55.534: subnet 152.1.12.0, metric=501
> r6#
> *Mar 1 20:30:04.106: IGRP: received update from 152.1.0.2 on Ethernet0
> *Mar 1 20:30:04.106: network 152.10.0.0, metric 1600 (neighbor 501)
> *Mar 1 20:30:04.110: network 152.11.0.0, metric 1600 (neighbor 501)
> *Mar 1 20:30:04.114: network 152.12.0.0, metric 1600 (neighbor 501)
> *Mar 1 20:30:04.118: network 152.13.0.0, metric 1600 (neighbor 501)
> *Mar 1 20:30:04.122: network 152.14.0.0, metric 1600 (neighbor 501)
> *Mar 1 20:30:04.122: network 152.15.0.0, metric 1600 (neighbor 501)
> *Mar 1 20:30:04.126: network 152.16.0.0, metric 1600 (neighbor 501)
> r6#
> r6#
>
> Philip G. Virnoche
> Sr. Network Engineer - AT&T Wireless
> phone: 425.580.5239
> cell: 206.601.3134
>
> "HAM AND EGGS - A day's work for a chicken; A lifetime commitment for a
> pig."
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tom cheung [mailto:tkc9789@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 4:53 AM
> To: hhlin@szskzj.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: How to delete CAM entries marked 'Port Security Entry'
>
>
> set port security 2/17 disable
>
>
> >From: "Haohong Lin" <hhlin@szskzj.com>
> >Reply-To: "Haohong Lin" <hhlin@szskzj.com>
> >To: "CCIELab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: How to delete CAM entries marked 'Port Security Entry'
> >Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 16:04:14 +0800
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> > I can't delete some static entries in cam table, as show in
following.
>
> >I
> >find no command corelatively via show conf all .
> > I have pressed "set arp" command before, which maybe results in such
> >situation. After entered with "set arp ...", no commands are correlating
> >with it in nvram config.
> >
> > Any advice is welcome, thanks in advance
> >
> >Cat5k> (enable) sh cam stat
> >* = Static Entry. + = Permanent Entry. # = System Entry. R = Router
Entry.
> >X = Port Security Entry
> >
> >VLAN Dest MAC/Route Des [CoS] Destination Ports or VCs / [Protocol
> >Type]
> >---- ------------------ -----
> >-----------------------------------------
> >--
> >1 00-08-ca-fe-ca-fe X 2/17
> >1 00-10-7b-3a-26-ee X 2/17
> >Total Matching CAM Entries Displayed = 2
> >Cat5k> (enable)
> >
> >
> >
> >regards,
> >
> >Haohong Lin
> >**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:34 GMT-3