From: Michael Storie (mstorie@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Apr 13 2001 - 20:14:49 GMT-3
Are you sure about that? Without an IP address on the Physical interface, I
don't see how disabling split-horizon would affect it.
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: Dan <dp595@optonline.net>
To: Haohong Lin <hhlin@szskzj.com>; Tarun Pahuja <tpahuja@hotmail.com>
Cc: CCIELab <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: split horizon
> I think you will still need to disable split-horizon on the "physical"
> interface.
>
> Dan Pontrelli
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Haohong Lin" <hhlin@szskzj.com>
> To: "Tarun Pahuja" <tpahuja@hotmail.com>
> Cc: "CCIELab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 11:25 PM
> Subject: RE: split horizon
>
>
> > Hi, Pahuja
> >
> > If you using point-to-point sub-interface and different subnets, it
is
> > unnecessay to disable eigrp split-horizon on hub router. But as with one
> > common subnet, Disabling eigrp split-horizon is required. So, the
spokes'
> > routes can distribute each others.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tarun Pahuja [mailto:tpahuja@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: 2001 04 13 3:50
> > To: hhlin@szskzj.com
> > Subject: split horizon
> >
> >
> > hello friend,
> > Just read your note on groupstudy. I am slightly confussed
> > about eigrp split horizon. Do i need to diable it on the hum router for
> the
> > slokes to share information. that would only be possible if the hum
router
> > has not sun-interafaces. If the hun router has suninterfaces they you
not
> > bother about split horizon.
> >
> > am i right?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:45 GMT-3