From: Atif Awan (atifawan@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Feb 22 2001 - 02:52:42 GMT-3
Well you cannot turn it off when you are explicitly told to let it remain in
the ON state :)
I constructed the same scenario one more time and everything went as
smoothly as it can be ... i am pretty sure i was not doing anything wrong
the first time but anyways it worked this time and i hope that things like
these dont happen during ones lab :)
>From: "Elias Aggelidis" <eaggel@algo.com.gr>
>Reply-To: "Elias Aggelidis" <eaggel@algo.com.gr>
>To: "Atif Awan" <atifawan@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: BGP synchronization issue
>Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 01:45:38 +0200
>
>Dear Atif,
>
>BGP sync must be switched off in EVERY IBGP AND EBGP peer
>inorder to work correct.
>
>I have similar problem and I have to switch it off everywere
>in my config.
>
>Last month when I was attending the ABGP seminar
>the tutor was saying to get it off from my configs
>from every router inorder to work correct.
>
>Regards
>
>Elias Aggelidis
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Atif Awan" <atifawan@hotmail.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2001 9:38 PM
>Subject: BGP synchronization issue
>
>
> >
> > Did anyone ever have a problem with BGP and IGP synchronization when the
>IGP
> > route exists in the routing table. R4 and R3 are IBGP peers and R4 is
> > getting IBGP route 199.99.99.0/24 from R3. R4 also has in its routing
>table
> > an OSPF E2 route 199.99.99.0/24. R4 is not advertising this route to the
> > EBGP neighbors as it says in the debugs that the route is not
>synchronized.
> >
> > On the other hand R3 is also getting an IBGP route from R4
>( 209.10.1.0/24 )
> > and R3 has no problems with the synchronization issues. And trust me R3
>is
> > not configured with the no sync command. Can anyone help me with this
>issue.
> >
> > Regards
> > Atif
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:56 GMT-3