From: perez claude-vincent (claude_vincent@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Feb 22 2001 - 00:12:41 GMT-3
Yes, you cannot turn it off. Be sure once again that
the redistribution of EBGP routes into your IGP is
well done otherwise I would suggest you to paste your
configs and routing tables.
cvp
--- Atif Awan <atifawan@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Well you cannot turn it off when you are explicitly
> told to let it remain in
> the ON state :)
>
> I constructed the same scenario one more time and
> everything went as
> smoothly as it can be ... i am pretty sure i was not
> doing anything wrong
> the first time but anyways it worked this time and i
> hope that things like
> these dont happen during ones lab :)
>
>
> >From: "Elias Aggelidis" <eaggel@algo.com.gr>
> >Reply-To: "Elias Aggelidis" <eaggel@algo.com.gr>
> >To: "Atif Awan" <atifawan@hotmail.com>,
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: Re: BGP synchronization issue
> >Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 01:45:38 +0200
> >
> >Dear Atif,
> >
> >BGP sync must be switched off in EVERY IBGP AND
> EBGP peer
> >inorder to work correct.
> >
> >I have similar problem and I have to switch it off
> everywere
> >in my config.
> >
> >Last month when I was attending the ABGP seminar
> >the tutor was saying to get it off from my configs
> >from every router inorder to work correct.
> >
> >Regards
> >
> >Elias Aggelidis
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Atif Awan" <atifawan@hotmail.com>
> >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2001 9:38 PM
> >Subject: BGP synchronization issue
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Did anyone ever have a problem with BGP and IGP
> synchronization when the
> >IGP
> > > route exists in the routing table. R4 and R3 are
> IBGP peers and R4 is
> > > getting IBGP route 199.99.99.0/24 from R3. R4
> also has in its routing
> >table
> > > an OSPF E2 route 199.99.99.0/24. R4 is not
> advertising this route to the
> > > EBGP neighbors as it says in the debugs that the
> route is not
> >synchronized.
> > >
> > > On the other hand R3 is also getting an IBGP
> route from R4
> >( 209.10.1.0/24 )
> > > and R3 has no problems with the synchronization
> issues. And trust me R3
> >is
> > > not configured with the no sync command. Can
> anyone help me with this
> >issue.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Atif
> > >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:56 GMT-3