From: Justin Menga (Justin.Menga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Feb 07 2001 - 18:40:36 GMT-3
Hmmm, the question only mentions an interface - route filtering is done on a
per-network basis, where as passive is done on a per-interface basis. Thus,
logic dictates that the question refers to using passive interface.....In
the lab, the questions are very explicit and aren't really open to much
interpretation.
Regards,
Justin Menga CCIE #6640 MCSE+I CCSE
WAN Specialist
Computerland New Zealand
PO Box 3631, Auckland
DDI: (+64) 9 360 4864 Mobile: (+64) 25 349 599
mailto: justin.menga@computerland.co.nz
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert DeVito [mailto:robertdevito@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 8 February 2001 10:30 a.m.
To: Simon.Baxter@au.logical.com; gferro@netstarnetworks.com;
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Passive interface questions
Simon,
Makes sense, it sounds like not to advertise the network that is configured
on tokenring0. If the serial interface and tokenring interface are on in the
same classfull boundry then it will be advertise the tokenring network
regardless of the passive interface. So that leaves you will only one
option, filter the tokenring network (distribute-list/route-maps) from
eigrp.
Hope this helps.
----Original Message Follows----
From: Simon Baxter <Simon.Baxter@au.logical.com>
Reply-To: Simon Baxter <Simon.Baxter@au.logical.com>
To: Greg Ferro <gferro@netstarnetworks.com>, "CCIE Group Study
(E-mail)" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject: Passive interface questions
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 09:12:58 +1100
Can anyone clarify the requirements when a question is worded :
"Configure eigrp on the serial link between R1 and R2. Make sure
token-ring0 is not included in eigrp"
If the serial link network address falls in the same class boundary as the
token, the token network will still advertised even if there's an
appropriate passive-interface.
Is the question asking you not to send eigrp updates down the link?
Or is is asking you to do a distribute-list out (or similar) to exclude the
token ring network???
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:40 GMT-3