From: Justin Menga (Justin.Menga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Feb 07 2001 - 18:37:01 GMT-3
I would interpret it as ensuring that EIGRP traffic is not sent out to0 - if
you were to filter routes, I think you would be told to explicitly ensure
routes to the to0 network were not visible via EIGRP.
Regards,
Justin Menga CCIE #6640 MCSE+I CCSE
WAN Specialist
Computerland New Zealand
PO Box 3631, Auckland
DDI: (+64) 9 360 4864 Mobile: (+64) 25 349 599
mailto: justin.menga@computerland.co.nz
-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Baxter [mailto:Simon.Baxter@au.logical.com]
Sent: Thursday, 8 February 2001 11:13 a.m.
To: Greg Ferro; CCIE Group Study (E-mail)
Subject: Passive interface questions
Can anyone clarify the requirements when a question is worded :
"Configure eigrp on the serial link between R1 and R2. Make sure
token-ring0 is not included in eigrp"
If the serial link network address falls in the same class boundary as the
token, the token network will still advertised even if there's an
appropriate passive-interface.
Is the question asking you not to send eigrp updates down the link?
Or is is asking you to do a distribute-list out (or similar) to exclude the
token ring network???
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:40 GMT-3