From: Alan Basinger (abasinge@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Feb 06 2001 - 16:08:18 GMT-3
Jim,
You are correct. We were taught this in the ECP1 class.
Alan
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
jim.fitzpatrick@verizon.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 12:08 PM
To: bhescock@cisco.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: re: token switch 3920 config problems
Brian,
I seem to remember from the BRS class that we has a similar problem, the
solution was to make sure that you either set the 3920 for source-route
transparent or put 'multiring all' on the router interfaces.
Cheers,
Jim
---------- Original Text ----------
From: "Brian Hescock" <bhescock@cisco.com>, on 2/6/2001 11:38 AM:
Having problems getting two routers to talk using a 3920 switch in the
middle. Very basic config but it isn't working:
3920 config
brf 100
|
crf 10 (parent is brf 100)
| |
port port (ports linked to crf 10)
3 4
| |
R1 R2
So ports 3 and 4 on the switch are both linked to crf 10, which has a
parent of brf 100. R1 has an ip address of 10.1.1.1 and R2 and ip
address of 10.1.1.2, ring speed 16 (that's all). Both are up/up but I'm
getting encap failed when trying to ping. I wouldn't think I need any
bridging commands at all on R1 and R2, it should be just like plugging
into a MAU.
The f'n search engine for the archives isn't working at groupstudy.com
again, 2nd day in a row (was hoping to find the answer there). Any
ideas why it wouldn't be working?
Brian
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:39 GMT-3