From: Brian Hescock (bhescock@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Feb 06 2001 - 16:14:01 GMT-3
Here's what it wasn't:
- didn't need ring numbers on the routers (no need)
- didn't need multiring
- didn't need anything on router A or B other than the ip address on the
token ring interface and ring speed 16
- didn't work even after resetting the switch and using trf-default
It did work after:
- replacing a cable (went "bad" during the middle of troubleshooting)
- replacing a router which for some reason the token ring interface wasn't
reply to arp requests even after a reload (interface was up/up)
The three curses of the world: politics, religion, and ibm networking
Works fine now.
B.
Johnny Dedon wrote:
> Try multiring all on the router interfaces.
> Johnny Dedon
> Senior Staff Consultant
> Exodus Professional Services
> johnny.dedon@exodus.net
> www.exodus.net
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian Hescock" <bhescock@cisco.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 11:38 AM
> Subject: token switch 3920 config problems
>
> > Having problems getting two routers to talk using a 3920 switch in the
> > middle. Very basic config but it isn't working:
> >
> > 3920 config
> >
> > brf 100
> > |
> > crf 10 (parent is brf 100)
> > | |
> > port port (ports linked to crf 10)
> > 3 4
> > | |
> > R1 R2
> >
> > So ports 3 and 4 on the switch are both linked to crf 10, which has a
> > parent of brf 100. R1 has an ip address of 10.1.1.1 and R2 and ip
> > address of 10.1.1.2, ring speed 16 (that's all). Both are up/up but I'm
> > getting encap failed when trying to ping. I wouldn't think I need any
> > bridging commands at all on R1 and R2, it should be just like plugging
> > into a MAU.
> >
> > The f'n search engine for the archives isn't working at groupstudy.com
> > again, 2nd day in a row (was hoping to find the answer there). Any
> > ideas why it wouldn't be working?
> >
> > Brian
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:39 GMT-3