From: Bernard Dunn (dunn@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jan 26 2001 - 18:42:35 GMT-3
No, the bridge-group numbers don't have to match between peers. It's
terminated at the routers.
Regards
Bernard.
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, BUI, TIN T (SBCSI) wrote:
> Another twist on this question: Does dlsw bridge-group number have to match
> between R1 & R2? In other words, can I define dlsw bridge-group 5 on R1 and
> dlsw bridge-group 10 on R2 and expect that R1 can talk to R2 via dlsw?
> thanks
>
> > Tin T. Bui
> > Senior Network Manager
> > CCNP, CNE, MCP
> > Network Management Center
> > SBC Services Inc.
> > 7337 Trade Street, Rm 1110
> > San Diego, Ca 92121
> > Office #: 858-886-4644/858-886-4589
> > Pager #: 858-494-0482
> > Fax #: 858-549-4103
> > Email: tb4565@sbc.com
> >
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernard Dunn [mailto:dunn@cisco.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 12:26 PM
> To: BUI, TIN T (SBCSI)
> Cc: 'Jarrod Mills'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: multiple dlsw bridges
>
>
>
> Yes, 'dlsw bridge-group' number is to match with the interface
> 'bridge-group 1'.
>
> You can have multiple 'dlsw bridge-group' commands. Think of it as
> broadcast domains on the local router.
>
> Regards
>
> Bernard.
>
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, BUI, TIN T (SBCSI) wrote:
>
> > What I mean in term of linking them together is that station on R1 e0 can
> > talk to R2 e0 and R1 e1 can talk to R2 e0 and vice versa. R1 e0 does not
> > need to talk to R1 e1. I don't need bgroup as the default is "all". My
> > only question is: Do I need dlsw bridge-group 1 and dlsw bridge-group 2 on
> > R1 or can I get away with only specifying just dlsw bridge-group 1. The
> > reason I'm asking is I think the "1" is a virtual bridge-group in
> statement
> > dlsw bridge-group 1 and will take all bridges on the router and attach via
> > dlsw.
> >
> > Another way to reword this question is: Does the "1" in dlsw bridge-group
> 1
> > have to match the "1" in bridge-group 1 in interface mode for R1. If it
> has
> > to match then I would need two dlsw bridge-group statements because I have
> > both bridge-group 1 and bridge-group 2 on R1.
> >
> > > Tin T. Bui
> > > Senior Network Manager
> > > CCNP, CNE, MCP
> > > Network Management Center
> > > SBC Services Inc.
> > > 7337 Trade Street, Rm 1110
> > > San Diego, Ca 92121
> > > Office #: 858-886-4644/858-886-4589
> > > Pager #: 858-494-0482
> > > Fax #: 858-549-4103
> > > Email: tb4565@sbc.com
> > >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jarrod Mills [mailto:jarrod.mills@bellnetworks.com]
> > Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 11:31 AM
> > To: BUI, TIN T (SBCSI); ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: multiple dlsw bridges
> >
> >
> > what do you mean by link them together? If you mean you want traffic from
> > bridge group 1 on R1 to only goto bridge-group 1 on R2 and vice-versa, you
> > need additional commands (bgroups, etc) and add the bgroup list number to
> > the remote peer statement.
> >
> > HTH
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "BUI, TIN T (SBCSI)" <tb4565@sbc.com>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 1:05 PM
> > Subject: multiple dlsw bridges
> >
> >
> > > Suppose I have bridge group 1 and bridge group 2 on R1 and I have bridge
> > > group 1 on R2 and I want to link them together via dlsw. Would this be
> a
> > > correct config or do I not need dlsw bridge-group 2? thanks
> > >
> > > Router 1
> > > !
> > > source-bridge ring-group 2000
> > > dlsw bridge-group 1
> > > dlsw bridge-group 2
> > > dlsw local-peer peer-id 150.150.1.1
> > > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 150.150.2.1
> > > !
> > > interface Loopback0
> > > ip address 150.150.1.1 255.255.255.0
> > > !
> > > interface Ethernet0
> > > ip address 150.150.30.1 255.255.255.0
> > > bridge-group 1
> > > !
> > > interface ethernet1
> > > ip address 150.150.31.1 255.255.255.0
> > > bridge-group 2
> > >
> > > bridge 1 protocol dec
> > > bridge 2 protocol dec
> > > !
> > > Router 2:
> > > !
> > > source-bridge ring-group 2000
> > > dlsw local-peer peer-id 150.150.2.1
> > > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 150.150.1.1
> > > dlsw bridge-group 1
> > > !
> > > interface Loopback0
> > > ip address 150.150.2.1 255.255.255.0
> > > !
> > > interface Serial0
> > > ip address 150.150.100.2 255.255.255.0
> > > !
> > > interface Ethernet0
> > > ip address 150.150.40.1 255.255.255.0
> > > bridge-group 1
> > > !
> > > bridge 1 protocol dec
> > >
> > > > Tin T. Bui
> > > > Senior Network Manager
> > > > CCNP, CNE, MCP
> > > > Network Management Center
> > > > SBC Services Inc.
> > > > 7337 Trade Street, Rm 1110
> > > > San Diego, Ca 92121
> > > > Office #: 858-886-4644/858-886-4589
> > > > Pager #: 858-494-0482
> > > > Fax #: 858-549-4103
> > > > Email: tb4565@sbc.com
> > > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:45 GMT-3