From: Bernard Dunn (dunn@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jan 26 2001 - 17:25:52 GMT-3
Yes, 'dlsw bridge-group' number is to match with the interface
'bridge-group 1'.
You can have multiple 'dlsw bridge-group' commands. Think of it as
broadcast domains on the local router.
Regards
Bernard.
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, BUI, TIN T (SBCSI) wrote:
> What I mean in term of linking them together is that station on R1 e0 can
> talk to R2 e0 and R1 e1 can talk to R2 e0 and vice versa. R1 e0 does not
> need to talk to R1 e1. I don't need bgroup as the default is "all". My
> only question is: Do I need dlsw bridge-group 1 and dlsw bridge-group 2 on
> R1 or can I get away with only specifying just dlsw bridge-group 1. The
> reason I'm asking is I think the "1" is a virtual bridge-group in statement
> dlsw bridge-group 1 and will take all bridges on the router and attach via
> dlsw.
>
> Another way to reword this question is: Does the "1" in dlsw bridge-group 1
> have to match the "1" in bridge-group 1 in interface mode for R1. If it has
> to match then I would need two dlsw bridge-group statements because I have
> both bridge-group 1 and bridge-group 2 on R1.
>
> > Tin T. Bui
> > Senior Network Manager
> > CCNP, CNE, MCP
> > Network Management Center
> > SBC Services Inc.
> > 7337 Trade Street, Rm 1110
> > San Diego, Ca 92121
> > Office #: 858-886-4644/858-886-4589
> > Pager #: 858-494-0482
> > Fax #: 858-549-4103
> > Email: tb4565@sbc.com
> >
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jarrod Mills [mailto:jarrod.mills@bellnetworks.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 11:31 AM
> To: BUI, TIN T (SBCSI); ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: multiple dlsw bridges
>
>
> what do you mean by link them together? If you mean you want traffic from
> bridge group 1 on R1 to only goto bridge-group 1 on R2 and vice-versa, you
> need additional commands (bgroups, etc) and add the bgroup list number to
> the remote peer statement.
>
> HTH
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "BUI, TIN T (SBCSI)" <tb4565@sbc.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 1:05 PM
> Subject: multiple dlsw bridges
>
>
> > Suppose I have bridge group 1 and bridge group 2 on R1 and I have bridge
> > group 1 on R2 and I want to link them together via dlsw. Would this be a
> > correct config or do I not need dlsw bridge-group 2? thanks
> >
> > Router 1
> > !
> > source-bridge ring-group 2000
> > dlsw bridge-group 1
> > dlsw bridge-group 2
> > dlsw local-peer peer-id 150.150.1.1
> > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 150.150.2.1
> > !
> > interface Loopback0
> > ip address 150.150.1.1 255.255.255.0
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0
> > ip address 150.150.30.1 255.255.255.0
> > bridge-group 1
> > !
> > interface ethernet1
> > ip address 150.150.31.1 255.255.255.0
> > bridge-group 2
> >
> > bridge 1 protocol dec
> > bridge 2 protocol dec
> > !
> > Router 2:
> > !
> > source-bridge ring-group 2000
> > dlsw local-peer peer-id 150.150.2.1
> > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 150.150.1.1
> > dlsw bridge-group 1
> > !
> > interface Loopback0
> > ip address 150.150.2.1 255.255.255.0
> > !
> > interface Serial0
> > ip address 150.150.100.2 255.255.255.0
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0
> > ip address 150.150.40.1 255.255.255.0
> > bridge-group 1
> > !
> > bridge 1 protocol dec
> >
> > > Tin T. Bui
> > > Senior Network Manager
> > > CCNP, CNE, MCP
> > > Network Management Center
> > > SBC Services Inc.
> > > 7337 Trade Street, Rm 1110
> > > San Diego, Ca 92121
> > > Office #: 858-886-4644/858-886-4589
> > > Pager #: 858-494-0482
> > > Fax #: 858-549-4103
> > > Email: tb4565@sbc.com
> > >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:44 GMT-3