From: chenriqu (chenriqu@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jan 23 2001 - 01:33:03 GMT-3
Cisco recommands using sub interfaces. It states in the Doc CD that primary
and secondary networks will not be supported in the future. He is the link:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/np2_c
/2cipx.htm#xtocid2504913
Craig
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Wayne Hu
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 10:37 PM
To: Justin Menga; 'Robert DeVito'; hardinl@bah.com;
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: IPX question
I think secondary IPX network address for different encap type will be
easier in the Lab, any comments?
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Justin Menga
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 5:26 PM
To: 'Robert DeVito'; hardinl@bah.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: IPX question
Hi - FYI
You don't need to do it on both routers - just on one router is sufficient -
IPX routing takes care of the connectivity rather than at Layer 2.
Regards,
Justin Menga CCIE #6640 MCSE+I CCSE
WAN Specialist
Computerland New Zealand
PO Box 3631, Auckland
DDI: (+64) 9 360 4864 Mobile: (+64) 25 349 599
mailto: justin.menga@computerland.co.nz
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert DeVito [mailto:robertdevito@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 22 January 2001 6:47 p.m.
To: hardinl@bah.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: IPX question
Everyone,
This is the way I ended it up doing it. Comments?
Router 7
!
interface Ethernet0
mac-address 0007.0007.0007
ip address 140.10.30.7 255.255.252.0
no ip directed-broadcast
media-type 10BaseT
!
interface Ethernet0.1
no ip directed-broadcast
ipx network 777 encapsulation SAP
!
interface Ethernet0.2
no ip directed-broadcast
ipx network 444
Router 4
!
interface Ethernet0/0
mac-address 0004.0004.0004
ip address 140.10.30.4 255.255.252.0
no ip directed-broadcast
ip ospf interface-retry 0
!
interface Ethernet0/0.1
no ip directed-broadcast
ipx network 777 encapsulation SAP
!
interface Ethernet0/0.2
no ip directed-broadcast
ipx network 444
Robert
----Original Message Follows----
From: Les Hardin <hardinl@bah.com>
To: "Robert DeVito" <robertdevito@hotmail.com>,ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: IPX question
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 00:28:36 -0500
Robert,
No problem if you use two different encapsulation types. That's how we use
to do it in the "real world."
Les
At 05:22 AM 1/22/2001 +0000, Robert DeVito wrote:
>I came accross a scenerio that require to have two different novell network
>numbers on the name ethernet segment and maintain connectivity.
>
> R7
> | ipx network = 7
>---------------------
> |ipx network = 4
> R4
>How would you do this? The only thing I can think if is using two
>subinterfaces and defining network 7 and network 4 on each router..
>Thoughts?
>
>Thanks in advanced,
>Robert
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:40 GMT-3