Re: aggregate addresses and redistribution

From: Ilya Mazhara (willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:15:31 GMT-3


   
Well another Qs are inline:

"Connary, Julie Ann" wrote:

> 2. to solve this problem you have 3 choices:
> a. if possible - summarize at OSPF Area border routers. Say if you
> have an area 3 with a /28 bit subnet mask, use area 3 range x.x.x.x
> 255.255.255.0 to summarize to the /24 bit mask and then it will get
> redistributed into IGRP.
What can I do then VLSM routes have less specific mask - /22 for
example?

> b. on the redistribution router create a static route to null 0 to
> summarize to the 24 bit boundary, ip route x.x.x.x 255.255.255.0 null 0 and
> redistribute static into IGRP.
So but its prohobited at lab?

> c. use a ip default-network on the redistribution router or a
> downstream IGRP router. Remember that the default network must
> point to another address range. so if your address range is
> x.x.x.x the default route must point to y.y.y.y. This installs
> a gateway of last resort into your routing table. Remember that
> IGRP does not use the 0.0.0.0 route.
Another name of static route as i maen. Is it legal at lab?



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:34 GMT-3