From: Connary, Julie Ann (jconnary@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jan 18 2001 - 13:14:54 GMT-3
Try the following tech tip on CCO - it
explains what to do if the OSPF has a less specific mask than the RIP or IGRP:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/52.html
Julie Ann
At 06:15 PM 1/18/2001 +0300, you wrote:
>Well another Qs are inline:
>
>"Connary, Julie Ann" wrote:
>
> > 2. to solve this problem you have 3 choices:
> > a. if possible - summarize at OSPF Area border routers. Say if you
> > have an area 3 with a /28 bit subnet mask, use area 3 range x.x.x.x
> > 255.255.255.0 to summarize to the /24 bit mask and then it will get
> > redistributed into IGRP.
>What can I do then VLSM routes have less specific mask - /22 for
>example?
>
> > b. on the redistribution router create a static route to null 0 to
> > summarize to the 24 bit boundary, ip route x.x.x.x 255.255.255.0 null 0 and
> > redistribute static into IGRP.
>So but its prohobited at lab?
>
> > c. use a ip default-network on the redistribution router or a
> > downstream IGRP router. Remember that the default network must
> > point to another address range. so if your address range is
> > x.x.x.x the default route must point to y.y.y.y. This installs
> > a gateway of last resort into your routing table. Remember that
> > IGRP does not use the 0.0.0.0 route.
>Another name of static route as i maen. Is it legal at lab?
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:34 GMT-3