DLSW Question-Peer groups

From: Lykourgiotis Paraskevas (ParaskevasL@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jan 15 2001 - 10:41:43 GMT-3

• Next message: Santarsiero, Bill: "RE:"
• Previous message: David FAHED: "Re: Pinging a Local Multipoint Subinterface."
• Next in thread: Kevin Mahoney: "RE: DLSW Question-Peer groups"
• Maybe reply: Kevin Mahoney: "RE: DLSW Question-Peer groups"
• Maybe reply: Ronnie Royston: "RE: DLSW Question-Peer groups"
• Maybe reply: Mark Stover: "RE: DLSW Question-Peer groups"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Hi all.
One more DLSW question.

Suppose the following scenario :

r1---r2---r3

r1 and r2 are in a peer group where r2 is the border peer.
r2 has r1 and r3 as remote peers.
The question: Does r3 have to be in a peer group (by himself) to assure that
explorers from r1 are always sent to r3 also?
Me, I thought not until I found a Cisco presentation for DLSW saying that r3
has to be in a peer-group also (i.e. in a second peer-group having only r3
as a member). Why?

TIA
Paraskevas

• Next message: Santarsiero, Bill: "RE:"
• Previous message: David FAHED: "Re: Pinging a Local Multipoint Subinterface."
• Next in thread: Kevin Mahoney: "RE: DLSW Question-Peer groups"
• Maybe reply: Kevin Mahoney: "RE: DLSW Question-Peer groups"
• Maybe reply: Ronnie Royston: "RE: DLSW Question-Peer groups"
• Maybe reply: Mark Stover: "RE: DLSW Question-Peer groups"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:30 GMT-3