From: Kevin Mahoney (kmahoney1@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jan 15 2001 - 12:32:19 GMT-3
Yes it has to be a border peer in its own group.
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Lykourgiotis Paraskevas
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 8:42 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: DLSW Question-Peer groups
Hi all.
One more DLSW question.
Suppose the following scenario :
r1---r2---r3
r1 and r2 are in a peer group where r2 is the border peer.
r2 has r1 and r3 as remote peers.
The question: Does r3 have to be in a peer group (by himself) to assure that
explorers from r1 are always sent to r3 also?
Me, I thought not until I found a Cisco presentation for DLSW saying that r3
has to be in a peer-group also (i.e. in a second peer-group having only r3
as a member). Why?
TIA
Paraskevas
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:30 GMT-3