From: Atif Awan (atifawan@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jan 11 2001 - 03:52:30 GMT-3
I disagree with this. Using the port-list command you can restrict
individual ethenet ports too.
>From: "ChrisH" <chrish@bjen.com>
>Reply-To: <chrish@bjen.com>
>To: "Atif Awan" <atifawan@hotmail.com>, <Simon.Baxter@au.logical.com>,
><rwebber@callisma.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: DLSw
>Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 22:32:01 -0500
>
>All ethernet ports are treated as s single entity (Ethernet bridge group).
>So if you have a router with multiple Ethernet ports they will be treated
>as
>one.
>
>Chris
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>Atif Awan
>Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 3:21 AM
>To: Simon.Baxter@au.logical.com; rwebber@callisma.com;
>ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: DLSw
>
>
>
>I just did a dlsw port-list 1 ? and it showed ethernet interface ... it
>even
>accepts it so i guess it should work .. but then havent tried it on a
>router
>with both an ethetnet and a token ring ... will do that and let you know.
>
> >From: Simon Baxter <Simon.Baxter@au.logical.com>
> >To: Rob Webber <rwebber@callisma.com>, 'Atif Awan'
><atifawan@hotmail.com>,
> >ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: RE: DLSw
> >Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 13:12:45 +1100
> >
> >I thought the port list couldn't work for ethernet?
> >
> >I thought ethernet must be tied to a bridge group and that bridge group
> >tied
> >to a dlsw remote peer.
> >
> >Can anyone clarify this?
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Rob Webber [mailto:rwebber@callisma.com]
> >Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 4:37 AM
> >To: 'Atif Awan'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: RE: DLSw
> >
> >
> >How about using port-lists? Port lists should limit the ports a remote
> >router can reach on the central site (where the list is applied). How
> >about:
> >
> >hostname Router2
> >!
> >dlsw remote-peer 1 tcp <Router1>
> >dlsw remote-peer 3 tcp <Router3>
> >!
> >dlsw port-list 1 <Router2's ether>
> >dlsw port-list 3 <Router2's ring1>
> >
> >(and also don't create a dlsw peer between router1 and router3)
> >
> >Rob.
> > >
> > >Let me try to make this a little clear :
> > >
> > >Router 1 --------- Router2 ---------- Router 3
> > > | | | |
> > >ether ether ring1 ring 2
> > >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:27 GMT-3