From: YJC (stiff.yu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Dec 06 2000 - 22:42:24 GMT-3
Allyn,
Thank you,but I think perhaps it 's wrong if I config as you said in lab.
I think CIR+EIR=line speed.otherwise,be=EIR/tc or be=EIR,because
BE only burst in first tc,so I think BE=EIR.can you give me answer.
----- Original Message -----
From: Allyn Baskerville <abaskerville@ibeam.com>
To: 'YJC' <stiff.yu@datacraft-asia.com>; CCIE Group Study (E-mail)
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 6:19 AM
Subject: RE: frame-relay traffic shape
> I just resolved a problem similar to this issue this morning. I set up
> traffic shaping first using the traffic rate command and then using the
> separate bc, cir (actual cir), and be commands. In both cases I was never
> able to burst above the cir. I finally called Cisco's TAC on the problem,
> and I was told the following is a general rule of thumb:
>
> Set cir as the line access rate
> Set mincir as the actual circuit cir
> Set bc as 1/8th the access rate
> Set be to 0
>
> Using the separate settings, you can burst above the CIR. In my case I
> implemented adaptive shaping using becns, and everything is working about
as
> I expected. Allyn
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: YJC [mailto:stiff.yu@datacraft-asia.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 1:59 AM
> To: CCIE Group Study (E-mail)
> Subject: frame-relay traffic shape
>
>
> hellow,
>
> I have two question.
>
> 1, what differnce when i use frame-relay traffic-rate or frame-relay
bc,cir
> ,be;
> for example:cir=48000,cir+eir=64000,tc=0.125
> the below is my config and sh frame-relay pvc,you can see many
> difference,why?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:59 GMT-3