From: Allyn Baskerville (abaskerville@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Dec 06 2000 - 19:19:46 GMT-3
I just resolved a problem similar to this issue this morning. I set up
traffic shaping first using the traffic rate command and then using the
separate bc, cir (actual cir), and be commands. In both cases I was never
able to burst above the cir. I finally called Cisco's TAC on the problem,
and I was told the following is a general rule of thumb:
Set cir as the line access rate
Set mincir as the actual circuit cir
Set bc as 1/8th the access rate
Set be to 0
Using the separate settings, you can burst above the CIR. In my case I
implemented adaptive shaping using becns, and everything is working about as
I expected. Allyn
-----Original Message-----
From: YJC [mailto:stiff.yu@datacraft-asia.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 1:59 AM
To: CCIE Group Study (E-mail)
Subject: frame-relay traffic shape
hellow,
I have two question.
1, what differnce when i use frame-relay traffic-rate or frame-relay bc,cir
,be;
for example:cir=48000,cir+eir=64000,tc=0.125
the below is my config and sh frame-relay pvc,you can see many
difference,why?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:59 GMT-3