From: Vijay Venkatesh (vijay.venkatesh@xxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Oct 30 2000 - 03:27:49 GMT-3
You do not need a static statement. Are you using mppe for your pptp ?
Is this PPTP on win 98 or win 2k ? Send me the config file ... oh and
one more thing do not go by the docs on Cisco's web site they are
wrong and TAC with all it's CCIEs is useless. Email me your config and
I beleive I can help. One last thing please tell me you are using
5.2(3).
Regards,
Vijay.
Jay Hennigan wrote:
>
> On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Jim Bond wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying to set up PIX PPTP without NAT but no
> > success. Cisco gives a sample config using NAT
> > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/pptppix.html but
> > I don't understand why they use 192.168.1.0.
> >
> > Here is my topology:
> > 172.16.1.0/24(outside)---PIX---(inside)172.16.2.0/24
> > I create a pool 172.16.1.100-172.16.1.200, but users
> > from outside can't reach internal network.
>
> According to this, it looks like you should have NAT. You have a different
> network outside than inside.
>
> Assuming you really mean no NAT, do you have a "static" statement mapping
> the addresses to themselves?
>
> It's a bit counterintuitive without NAT, but you should have something like
>
> static (inside,outside) 172.16.1.0 172.16.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
>
> See the PIX command reference regarding "static".
>
> --
> Jay Hennigan - Network Administration - jay@west.net
> NetLojix Communications, Inc. NASDAQ: NETX - http://www.netlojix.com/
> WestNet: Connecting you to the planet. 805 884-6323
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:31 GMT-3