From: Rob Hopkins (rshopkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Oct 29 2000 - 02:07:33 GMT-3
Did you use the nat 0 command?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Bond" <trycisco@yahoo.com>
To: <cisco@groupstudy.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 10:00 PM
Subject: PIX PPTP, no NAT
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to set up PIX PPTP without NAT but no
> success. Cisco gives a sample config using NAT
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/pptppix.html but
> I don't understand why they use 192.168.1.0.
>
> Here is my topology:
> 172.16.1.0/24(outside)---PIX---(inside)172.16.2.0/24
> I create a pool 172.16.1.100-172.16.1.200, but users
> from outside can't reach internal network.
>
> Any suggestion?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
> Jim
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:31 GMT-3