From: Lei Chen (leichen@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Oct 27 2000 - 19:01:01 GMT-3
I met the same problem before. In the igrp chapter of Caslow's book, it's
said that if you give a subnet in the "ip default-network statement", a
static route to the main network will be created automatically and you'll
see your "ip default-network " is gone. I guess the eigrp just does the same
thing. I dont' know either why this self-created static route can't be
removed without reloading the router.
Thanks,
Lei
----- Original Message -----
From: "Devinder Singh" <devinder@collabria.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 11:16 AM
Subject: EIGRP default.. experiment???
> Hi..
>
> Just for the sake of experiment, on one of the routers which was which was
> running eigrp and connected to another router part of FR network , I gave
> the command "ip default network 2.1.1.3". Results have totally
surprised
> me. I understand that we should give a classful network as default for
> eigrp but I just tried it to see what happens. Routing table of this
router
> before giving this command is given in the end.
>
> Then after giving this command, I get a static route added in the
> configuration and routing table which is
>
> wr t
> ..
> ip route 2.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 2.1.1.3
> ..
>
> sh ip route
> ...
> S 2.0.0.0/8 [1/0] via 2.1.1.3
> ....
>
> Now when I try removing this route from router by giving "no ip route
> 2.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 2.1.1.3", it says "no matching route to delete".
> Even if I give "no ip default network 2.1.1.3" command, it did not remove
> the static route.
> So I reloaded this router and then it allowd me to remove this static
> route..
> Can this all be explained?? Why didn't router allow me to removethe static
> route?? and first of all, why does it add a static route for 2.0.0.0
> network.
>
> Thanks
> Devin
>
>
>
> Routing table before giving "ip default network 2.1.1.3".
>
>
> Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> 50.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> C 50.1.1.0 is directly connected, Loopback10
> 2.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 6 subnets, 5 masks
> D EX 2.1.1.3/32 [170/2562816] via 2.1.1.149, 00:03:47, FastEthernet0/0
> D EX 2.22.22.0/24 [170/2562816] via 2.1.1.149, 00:03:47,
FastEthernet0/0
> S 2.0.0.0/8 [1/0] via 2.1.1.3
> D 2.1.1.0/25 [90/1764352] via 2.1.1.149, 00:06:07, FastEthernet0/0
> D EX 2.1.1.1/32 [170/2562816] via 2.1.1.149, 00:03:47, FastEthernet0/0
> C 2.1.1.148/30 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
> 101.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> D EX 101.1.1.0 [170/2562816] via 2.1.1.149, 00:06:09, FastEthernet0/0
> 5.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> C 5.5.5.0 is directly connected, Loopback5
> C 200.1.1.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet1/0
> 6.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> D EX 6.6.6.0 [170/2562816] via 2.1.1.149, 00:06:11, FastEthernet0/0
> 7.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> D EX 7.7.7.7 [170/2562816] via 2.1.1.149, 00:03:50, FastEthernet0/0
> 9.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> D EX 9.9.9.9 [170/2562816] via 2.1.1.149, 00:03:50, FastEthernet0/0
> C 207.104.149.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:31 GMT-3