RE: Loosing marks for extra commands

From: David Wolsefer (wolsefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Oct 25 2000 - 13:13:28 GMT-3


   
The bottom line is that the instructions for the lab are very specific about
what you cannot do and very general about what you can do. It is up to you
to interpret the instructions, but the proctor is there to assist you within
reason. If you ask him/her a question in a way that indicates you understand
the options clearly, then the proctor will usually find the words to guide
you one way or the other. On the other hand, if the way you phrase your
question indicates that you are fishing for an answer, then the proctor will
be of little help.

Regards,

David Wolsefer, CCIE #5858

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Shaun Nicholson
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 5:44 AM
To: ccielab
Subject: Loosing marks for extra commands

This may be a NDA violation but I read here on this group a few weeks ago
that you can loose marks for using extra unnessesary commands that were not
needed. I dont know if this is true or not can anyone shed some light on
this statement.

For example I like to remove any chance of frame relay inverse arp working
so I use the no frame-relay inverse-arp command and then do frame maps from
my hub router to all my spokes and then my spokes to my hub and then to the
spokes. Would this be considered extra commands? is this something the
proctor could answer on the day if its an NDA issue?

Anyone able to help? Please dont shoot yourself in the foot if it is and NDA
issue just dont answer.

Shaun



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:30 GMT-3