From: Connary, Julie Ann (jconnary@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Sep 28 2000 - 12:28:36 GMT-3
Personally, I think the lab candidate should understand generally the concepts
of setting up the ATM switch and this is good practice - as in this example
- because then they will
understand the big picture. I am never an advocate of knowing only half the
picture - I think
that could get you into trouble. I heard that we don't need to setup the
frame-relay switch either - but
I practice this so I understand the whole picture.
my two cents.
At 10:19 AM 9/28/2000 -0700, mark salmon wrote:
>I am not sure what he is trying to achieve but if his goal is practice
>for the lab, I sense is that any config/design that involves the testeee
>needing to make config changes to the lab ATM switch should be ruled
>out. IF the config is already there (on the ATM switch), it is always a
>good idea to know how to adapt the router config to achieve
>connectivity.
>
>Mark Lewis wrote:
> >
> > Like this:
> >
> > ls1010#
> > ls1010#
> > ls1010#sh run
> > Building configuration...
> >
> > Current configuration:
> > !
> > version 12.0
> > no service pad
> > service timestamps debug uptime
> > service timestamps log uptime
> > no service password-encryption
> > !
> > hostname ls1010
> > !
> > !
> > ip subnet-zero
> > !
> > atm lecs-address-default 47.0091.8100.0000.00d0.baf3.3b01.0010.7ba3.a703.00
> > 1
> > atm lecs-address-default 47.0091.8100.0000.00d0.baf3.3b01.0010.7b8f.e783.00
> > 2
> > atm address 47.0091.8100.0000.00d0.baf3.3b01.00d0.baf3.3b01.00
> > atm router pnni
> > no aesa embedded-number left-justified
> > node 1 level 56 lowest
> > redistribute atm-static
> > !
> > !
> > process-max-time 200
> > !
> > interface ATM0/1/0
> > no ip address
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > no atm ilmi-keepalive
> > !
> > interface ATM0/1/1
> > no ip address
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > no atm ilmi-keepalive
> > atm pvc 0 50 interface ATM0/1/0 5 255
> > atm pvc 4 44 interface ATM0/1/0 5 55
> > !
> > interface ATM0/1/2
> > no ip address
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > no atm ilmi-keepalive
> > atm pvc 0 255 interface ATM0/1/1 0 45
> > !
> >
> > (By they way, I know there's alot of other stuff in there, pvcs,lecs
> > addresses,etc. - I was using those for other things)
> >
> > (My two routers are hanging off 0/1/1 & 0/1/0)
> >
> > >From: "Connary, Julie Ann" <jconnary@cisco.com>
> > >To: "Mark Lewis" <markl11@hotmail.com>
> > >Subject: Re: ATM gurus...heeeelllp!!!
> > >Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 10:44:45 -0400
> > >
> > >What does your ls1010 setup look like?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >At 02:24 PM 9/28/2000 +0000, you wrote:
> > >
> > >>Hi Gurus,
> > >>
> > >>ATM SVCs WITHOUT ILMI.
> > >>----------------------
> > >>
> > >>Wonder if you can offer a little help.
> > >>
> > >>I've been configuring atm svcs using the 'atm esi-address' command
> without
> > >>any problems (this command requires the use of ilmi).
> > >>
> > >>However, if I'm not allowed to use ilmi (no atm pvc 1 0 16 ilmi) then it
> > >>seems to me that the command I need is 'atm nsap-address'. Now I know
> that
> > >>these two commands do bascially the same thing (but 'atm esi-address'
> > >>allows you to be slightly lazier (very appealing!)), but in the Cisco IOS
> > >>WAN Networking Solutions manual (the one for 11.x) it strongly implies
> > >>that the '..nsap-addr..' command CAN be used without ilmi.
> > >>
> > >>Now here's the crux of the problem: I can't get it to work!
> > >>
> > >>My config is very simple, two routers either side of ls1010, both with
> > >>approximately the following config:
> > >>
> > >>int atm0/0
> > >>atm pvc 1 0 5 qsaal
> > >>atm nsap-address xxx(prefix)xxx.123456789012.00
> > >>ip address xxxxx yyyyy
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>ESI is of course unique on each router.
> > >>
> > >>Now the moment I use '..esi-address' & ilmi, it starts working.
> > >>
> > >>So, how do I get SVCs WITHOUT ilmi to work???
> > >>
> > >>Thanks v.much in advance,
> > >>
> > >>Mark
> > >>
> > >>P.S. I know that it's possible to get it to work by turning on ilmi
> > >>temporarily (so that prefix & esi are exchanged), but I need a real
> > >>solution.
> > >>
> > >>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:08 GMT-3