From: Sheref Mohamed (baltaga_2000@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Sep 15 2000 - 12:34:23 GMT-3
I don't think that you need to be a CCIE in order to
grade the students. By doing some show and ping
commands I can tell if you should pass or fail !
Regards
S.
--- Geatti <geatti@home.com> wrote:
> In order to set the labs/equipment up and grade your
> work, I would think
> they would know a little more than a few commands on
> a list. I would think
> grading a test is a little trickier than taking the
> test, you've got to
> figure out how the candidate has approached a
> problem and whether that is
> deemed as correct. I wouldn't want the job.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Scott
> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 12:50 AM
> To: Timur.Mirza@Notes.airtouch.com;
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: [RE: Lab Date 8/22]
>
>
> I don't think proctors dont really need to be CCIE's
> they have a list of
> commands they type in and compare the responce to
> the expected results. If
> you they dont get the responce listed then its
> wrong. That way the lab
> isn't
> as subjective even though the proctors still have
> some flexability. Also, it
> doesn't tkae a CCIE to say, "I can't answer that you
> have to figure that out
> on your own."
>
>
> Scotty
>
> Timur.Mirza@Notes.airtouch.com wrote:
>
>
>
> agreed...i have had to experience major anxiety &
> depression to the max b4
> the
> second attempt...my 1st attempt was in jun & i had
> to wait 'til october!
> they
> need to open up more testing centers...also, i heard
> that most of the
> proctors
> are not ccie themselves - if that's true, man, whats
> up w/ that!!?? timur
>
>
>
>
>
> "Roger Wang" <rwang@genuity.net> on 09/14/2000
> 10:44:33 AM
>
> Please respond to "Roger Wang" <rwang@genuity.net>
>
>
>
> To: "cciemail" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> cc: (bcc: Timur Mirza/Corporate/AirTouch)
> Subject: RE: Lab Date 8/22
>
>
>
> I'm also very frustrated when it comes to scheduling
> my 2nd attempt. I even
> thought about flying 12 hours to Sao Paulo just
> because they have earlier
> dates open. It's not very fair, I think, when you
> can't even schedule to be
> tested without first waiting for 4 months! I don't
> mind failing the exam,
> but I want to fail it whenever I feel like to! :)
>
> It does appear that most people have already taken
> the exam at least once.
> That means the waiting list is going to get longer
> and longer because the
> number of people retaking the exam is growing.
>
> Rog
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> shotcaller30
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 9:31 AM
> To: cciemail; David Ankers
> Subject: Re: Lab Date 8/22
>
>
> I'm sorry guys. It was supposed to a be a joke
> , because of all the
> late dates people are trying to swap out. I don't
> want to cause any
> confusion though. I think the lab is scheduling for
> Jan now as far as I can
> tell. BTW, anyone know the recent for the recent
> bump up in wait time?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Ankers
> To: shotcaller30
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 5:49 PM
> Subject: Re: Lab Date 8/22
>
>
> Wow!! Is Halifax secduling for May
> already!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> I booked my CCIE 3 weeks ago and could only get jan
> the 8th in Halifax so I
> went for SJ on Dec 11th, maybe I should book my
> second attempt now! This
> must be an attempt by Cisco to keep the numbers down
> as no way can 4 months
> worth of people book the lab in 3 weeks. Good luck
> finding a swap
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: shotcaller30
> To: cciemail
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 9:20
> PM
> Subject: Lab Date 8/22
>
>
> I have a lab date for May 22 and 23rd in
> Halifax that I want to
> trade for November. I will take the best offer.
> Hurry because this should
> go fast ;)
>
>
>
>
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > Attachment: att1.htm
> > MIME Type: text/html
> > ---------------------------------------------
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:56 GMT-3