DLSW versus STUN w/ Local Ack

From: Brian Jacklin (bmjackli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Sep 05 2000 - 14:45:08 GMT-3

• Next message: Marc Russell: "RE: 18 step process when a packet enters a router..."
• Previous message: Evan Wagner: "RE: BGP on Cisco 1601 with 12.0(3)T IOS"
• Next in thread: Ron.Fuller@xxxxxx: "Re: DLSW versus STUN w/ Local Ack"
• Maybe reply: Ron.Fuller@xxxxxx: "Re: DLSW versus STUN w/ Local Ack"
• Maybe reply: Brian Jacklin: "RE: DLSW versus STUN w/ Local Ack"
• Maybe reply: Forest Riek: "Re: DLSW versus STUN w/ Local Ack"
• Maybe reply: Ron.Fuller@xxxxxx: "RE: DLSW versus STUN w/ Local Ack"
• Maybe reply: Forest Riek: "Re: DLSW versus STUN w/ Local Ack"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Can anyone give me a pro versus con analysis of DLSW versus STUN in the
following situation?

 AS/400 ----SDLC--- RTR-------Frame Relay WAN ----- RTR----SDLC---5394

 The AS 400 and 5394 controller are both connected to serial ports.

 Thanks!
 Brian Jacklin

• Next message: Marc Russell: "RE: 18 step process when a packet enters a router..."
• Previous message: Evan Wagner: "RE: BGP on Cisco 1601 with 12.0(3)T IOS"
• Next in thread: Ron.Fuller@xxxxxx: "Re: DLSW versus STUN w/ Local Ack"
• Maybe reply: Ron.Fuller@xxxxxx: "Re: DLSW versus STUN w/ Local Ack"
• Maybe reply: Brian Jacklin: "RE: DLSW versus STUN w/ Local Ack"
• Maybe reply: Forest Riek: "Re: DLSW versus STUN w/ Local Ack"
• Maybe reply: Ron.Fuller@xxxxxx: "RE: DLSW versus STUN w/ Local Ack"
• Maybe reply: Forest Riek: "Re: DLSW versus STUN w/ Local Ack"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:52 GMT-3