Re: Redistribution EIGRP-IGRP does it require same AS to work?

From: Thounda Craig, Jr (hjcgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Aug 31 2000 - 10:28:40 GMT-3


   
Sam,

If you want to isolate your IP/IPX routing domains (EIGRP vs. IGRP), then
simply make each AS (per router) different. As for Appletalk (EIGRP), you
have to assign unique AS #'s in order for routers to converge (see CCO for
"EIGRP/Appletalk").

brgds,
Thounda Craig

----- Original Message -----
From: Sam Munzani <sam@chinet.com>
To: CCIE Group Study (E-mail) <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 10:54 AM
Subject: Redistribution EIGRP-IGRP does it require same AS to work?

> Hi Group,
>
> I know that EIGRP and IGRP does automatic redistribution between them. How
> exactly does it work? Do they need same AS in order to do automatic
> redistribution? How can you avoid redistribution if that's the case.
>
> One the same token,
> EIGRP uses same routing update packets for IP,IPX & APPLE routes. For this
> to happen do you have to use same AS for IP,IPX & APPLE? You can do it
> easily with IP,IPX but when you use 2 routers with same AS for APPLE it
> complains about that number being used.
>
> Please help me understand behaviour of these routing protocols.
>
> Sam Munzani
> Lab: Sept 9-10 at San Jose
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:33 GMT-3