From: Clifton Stewart (cliftonlstewart@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Aug 31 2000 - 12:13:26 GMT-3
Sam,
Yes if the AS numbers are same for IGRP and EIGRP they will
automatically redistribute. If the numbers are different you have to
redistribute the routes like you would for any other protocol pulling in
routes. The AS number for EIGRP for AppleTalk is only significant to
THAT particular router. It is more of a tag than any thing else. As for
IPX-EIGRP if the AS is the same as IPX RIP are the same they will
automatically redistribute their routes. But be careful with IPX-RIP
there is a problem in NBMA environments; can you spot the issue?
-Cliff
Sam Munzani wrote:
>
> Hi Group,
>
> I know that EIGRP and IGRP does automatic redistribution between them. How
> exactly does it work? Do they need same AS in order to do automatic
> redistribution? How can you avoid redistribution if that's the case.
>
> One the same token,
> EIGRP uses same routing update packets for IP,IPX & APPLE routes. For this
> to happen do you have to use same AS for IP,IPX & APPLE? You can do it
> easily with IP,IPX but when you use 2 routers with same AS for APPLE it
> complains about that number being used.
>
> Please help me understand behaviour of these routing protocols.
>
> Sam Munzani
> Lab: Sept 9-10 at San Jose
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:33 GMT-3