From: Crouch, Keith (keith.crouch@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jul 19 2000 - 00:30:57 GMT-3
The 0 defines the ring list which is a list of ring numbers that can be
switched across the peer. Peer groups are something else.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mark salmon [SMTP:masalmon@cisco.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 2:09 PM
> To: Ccielab
> Subject: Re: DLSW+ Questions
>
> I will answer the 0 question. You can set up DLSw+ with multiple peer
> groups if you do that, then you will use the different peer group
> number in your remote peer config statement.
>
> see
>
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/idg4/nd2007.htm#xtocid209
> 616
>
> Watch the word wrap
>
> Figure 7-15 explains how it works.
>
>
> "Stanford M. Wong" wrote:
> >
> > I am really new to DLSW+ so please forgive me if this is a dumb
> question.
> >
> > Since DLSW+ ethernet to ethernet with TCP/IP encapsulation makes it
> appear
> > that hosts on both of the ethernet segments to "be bridged". Is it
> possible
> > for a routing protocol to be passed through the DLSW link? (sort of an
> > experiment)
> >
> > also, what does the "0" in the command mean/used for? i understand the
> rest
> > of the command but would like a better understanding of how that number
> is
> > used.
> >
> > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 11.1.1.1
> >
> > thanks in advance...
> >
> > stanford
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:55 GMT-3