From: Craig Everett (ceverett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jul 19 2000 - 01:09:59 GMT-3
yes, if you have the following
r1---ethernet---r2---dlsw---r3---ethernet---r4
r1 & r4 run a routing protocol, r2 & r3 run DLSw without ip enabled on the
ethernets and crb enabled.
The '0' is a ring list, you can group rings to be send out on the peer, this
means rings can go out on different peers, the 0 means all rings.
Craig
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Stanford M. Wong
Sent: Wednesday, 19 July 2000 10:27
To: Ccielab
Subject: DLSW+ Questions
I am really new to DLSW+ so please forgive me if this is a dumb question.
Since DLSW+ ethernet to ethernet with TCP/IP encapsulation makes it appear
that hosts on both of the ethernet segments to "be bridged". Is it possible
for a routing protocol to be passed through the DLSW link? (sort of an
experiment)
also, what does the "0" in the command mean/used for? i understand the rest
of the command but would like a better understanding of how that number is
used.
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 11.1.1.1
thanks in advance...
stanford
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:55 GMT-3