From: Hank Leung (hank1979@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jul 19 2000 - 01:23:43 GMT-3
and bgroups and port-lists and ring-lists, but not peer groups
>From: "Crouch, Keith" <keith.crouch@csfb.com>
>Reply-To: "Crouch, Keith" <keith.crouch@csfb.com>
>To: "Ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: DLSW+ Questions
>Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 12:30:57 +0900
>
>The 0 defines the ring list which is a list of ring numbers that can be
>switched across the peer. Peer groups are something else.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mark salmon [SMTP:masalmon@cisco.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 2:09 PM
> > To: Ccielab
> > Subject: Re: DLSW+ Questions
> >
> > I will answer the 0 question. You can set up DLSw+ with multiple peer
> > groups if you do that, then you will use the different peer group
> > number in your remote peer config statement.
> >
> > see
> >
> >
>http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/idg4/nd2007.htm#xtocid209
> > 616
> >
> > Watch the word wrap
> >
> > Figure 7-15 explains how it works.
> >
> >
> > "Stanford M. Wong" wrote:
> > >
> > > I am really new to DLSW+ so please forgive me if this is a dumb
> > question.
> > >
> > > Since DLSW+ ethernet to ethernet with TCP/IP encapsulation makes it
> > appear
> > > that hosts on both of the ethernet segments to "be bridged". Is it
> > possible
> > > for a routing protocol to be passed through the DLSW link? (sort of
>an
> > > experiment)
> > >
> > > also, what does the "0" in the command mean/used for? i understand
>the
> > rest
> > > of the command but would like a better understanding of how that
>number
> > is
> > > used.
> > >
> > > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 11.1.1.1
> > >
> > > thanks in advance...
> > >
> > > stanford
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:55 GMT-3