From: Earl Aboytes (earl@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed May 31 2000 - 11:50:21 GMT-3
I used to work for the national ATM group at GTE. We would use LANE to
trunk ATM across the WAN.
I never worked with SVC's. We have customers running SVC's but I could not
tell you their reasons for doing so.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Earl Aboytes
Senior Technical Conultant
GTE Managed Solutions
805-381-8817
earl.aboytes@telops.gte.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of Jeff
Sapiro
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 7:07 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: ATM PVC vs. SVC vs. LANE
My only experience with ATM is at a large ISP that
used PVC spokes for it's customers. I'm studying the
configs for SVC's, CLIP, and LANE, and I don't see the
advantage of using these, other than dynamic address
resolution. LANE seems particularly complex for this
small piece of functionality. Anybody have real world
examples of where these approaches are more
appropriate than PVC's? It would really help my
understanding of the configs.
-Jeff
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:32 GMT-3