From: Earl Aboytes (earl@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed May 31 2000 - 11:24:00 GMT-3
Use the map statements. Trust me!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Earl Aboytes
Senior Technical Conultant
GTE Managed Solutions
805-381-8817
earl.aboytes@telops.gte.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-----Original Message-----
From: Dana_L_Steffey@notes.seagate.com
[mailto:Dana_L_Steffey@notes.seagate.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 6:47 AM
To: Earl Aboytes
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: lab8
I also had a question come up on Router 5 in this lab concerning DLCI's.
It is more of a question of what is the right way to do it. And I figure
their is enough brain power in this group to answer it.
For those who do not have the cciebootcamp labs -
I have a point-to-mulitpoint subinterface -
Normally on physical interfaces I use the 'frame-relay map ip' command, and
on sub-interfaces I use the a 'frame-relay interf-dlci xxx command.
On this particular point-to-multipoint, it confused me a little but I went
ahead and typed in both DLCI's with the 'frame-relay interf-dlci' command
that I usually would on a subinterface and it seemed to work fine.
(haven't done that many point-to-multipoint's)
Afterwords I was looking through marc's answers I noticed he used two map
commands instead of the interface command - So is it more like an IOS thing
where the old map statements still work but it is good 'policy' to use the
interface dlci command on subinterfaces?
I guess more to the point - In the 'real' lab - static routes aside - do
you get knocked on points for idiosyncrasies like this? or as long as the
route table is good to go you are fine?
BTW - in case I didn't say it - THIS LAB REALLY SUCKS - or maybe more to
the point - it is showing me a got a lot more studying to in the next 20
days.
Dana
Lab: 21 June Nova Scotia
"Earl Aboytes" <earl@linkline.com>@groupstudy.com on 05/31/2000 03:18:26 AM
Please respond to "Earl Aboytes" <earl@linkline.com>
Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
cc:
Subject: lab8
In one part of the lab you are asked to redistribute between BGP and OSPF.
There is an IGRP domain present that also has a mutual redistribution
between it and OSPF. My problem is that the only way that I could get my
external type 1 and external type 2 routes to inject into BGP was to use
the "redistribute ospf 1 match external 1 external 2" command. I did not
see this command in the solution guide that Marc provided to me. Is this
the way that he wants you to do this or am I missing something?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Earl Aboytes
Senior Technical Conultant
GTE Managed Solutions
805-381-8817
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:32 GMT-3