From: Dana_L_Steffey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed May 31 2000 - 12:03:12 GMT-3
This book has been my woobie for the last couple of weeks (for the English
is not your first, woobie is like a security blanket for small kids - they
carry it around everywhere)
Another question one on "What is the best practice" concerning inverse-arp
- When do I shut it off? Do I really need to? or just do a clear frame
inverse when their seem to be problems?
It does not seem to be a problem with frame map statements on physical
interfaces.
So do you only shut it off on subinterfaces? - Haven't really run into a
scenario where I was screwed by this - or a router reload didn't solve it?
comments would be helpful.
Dana
Brian Hescock <bhescock@cisco.com> on 05/31/2000 09:17:21 AM
To: Dana_L_Steffey@notes.Seagate.COM
cc: Earl Aboytes <earl@linkline.com>, ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: lab8
Dana,
The key point may be not if it works now but will it work after you
reload the router. Caslow's book has an excellent discussion on frame
maps, dlci's, and inverse-arp. What may work on Day 1 and early Day 2
might not work during the troubleshooting session if the proctor reloaded
your router.
Brian
On Wed, 31 May 2000 Dana_L_Steffey@notes.seagate.com wrote:
>
> I also had a question come up on Router 5 in this lab concerning DLCI's.
> It is more of a question of what is the right way to do it. And I figure
> their is enough brain power in this group to answer it.
>
> For those who do not have the cciebootcamp labs -
>
> I have a point-to-mulitpoint subinterface -
>
> Normally on physical interfaces I use the 'frame-relay map ip' command,
and
> on sub-interfaces I use the a 'frame-relay interf-dlci xxx command.
>
> On this particular point-to-multipoint, it confused me a little but I
went
> ahead and typed in both DLCI's with the 'frame-relay interf-dlci' command
> that I usually would on a subinterface and it seemed to work fine.
> (haven't done that many point-to-multipoint's)
>
> Afterwords I was looking through marc's answers I noticed he used two map
> commands instead of the interface command - So is it more like an IOS
thing
> where the old map statements still work but it is good 'policy' to use
the
> interface dlci command on subinterfaces?
>
> I guess more to the point - In the 'real' lab - static routes aside - do
> you get knocked on points for idiosyncrasies like this? or as long as the
> route table is good to go you are fine?
>
> BTW - in case I didn't say it - THIS LAB REALLY SUCKS - or maybe more to
> the point - it is showing me a got a lot more studying to in the next 20
> days.
>
> Dana
> Lab: 21 June Nova Scotia
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Earl Aboytes" <earl@linkline.com>@groupstudy.com on 05/31/2000 03:18:26
AM
>
> Please respond to "Earl Aboytes" <earl@linkline.com>
>
> Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
>
>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> cc:
>
> Subject: lab8
>
>
>
>
> In one part of the lab you are asked to redistribute between BGP and
OSPF.
> There is an IGRP domain present that also has a mutual redistribution
> between it and OSPF. My problem is that the only way that I could get my
> external type 1 and external type 2 routes to inject into BGP was to use
> the "redistribute ospf 1 match external 1 external 2" command. I did not
> see this command in the solution guide that Marc provided to me. Is this
> the way that he wants you to do this or am I missing something?
>
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Earl Aboytes
>
> Senior Technical Conultant
>
> GTE Managed Solutions
>
> 805-381-8817
>
> earl.aboytes@telops.gte.com
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:32 GMT-3