From: Ryan B (rbenigno@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri May 05 2000 - 10:37:34 GMT-3
Did you reload your routers yet?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Martin" <jmartin@gte.net>
To: "Dave Gingrich" <Dave@dcg.org>
Cc: "Nnanna Obuba" <obuba@bellatlantic.net>; <wyan@ca.ibm.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 6:02 PM
Subject: Re: OSPF Routing
> You are correct. I've just done the following test and shows that OSPF
> *WILL* summarize out of its domain. Thanks for the correction. Nnanna, I
> didn't see the route to null that you said would be generated by the
router.
> Maybe a different version of code thing?
>
> hostname R1_joe
> !
> ip subnet-zero
> !
> interface Loopback0
> ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.224
> ip ospf network point-to-point
> !
> interface Loopback1
> ip address 192.168.10.65 255.255.255.240
> ip ospf network point-to-point
> !
> interface Loopback2
> ip address 192.168.10.97 255.255.255.248
> ip ospf network point-to-point
> !
> interface Serial1/0
> ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
> no fair-queue
> !
> router ospf 1
> network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0
> !
> ip classless
>
> Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> 192.168.10.0/24 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 4 masks
> C 192.168.10.96/29 is directly connected, Loopback2
> C 192.168.10.64/28 is directly connected, Loopback1
> C 192.168.10.0/27 is directly connected, Loopback0
> O 192.168.10.192/26 [110/65] via 192.168.2.2, 00:05:03, Serial1/0
> C 192.168.2.0/24 is directly connected, Serial1/0
>
> ----------------------------------
>
> hostname R2_joe
> !
> ip subnet-zero
> !
> interface Loopback0
> ip address 192.168.10.254 255.255.255.192
> ip ospf network point-to-point
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/0
> ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0
> duplex auto
> speed auto
> !
> interface Serial1/0
> ip address 192.168.2.2 255.255.255.0
> no fair-queue
> !
> router ospf 1
> summary-address 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0
> network 192.168.2.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
> network 192.168.10.254 0.0.0.0 area 0
> !
> router igrp 1
> redistribute ospf 1 metric 64000 20000 1 255 1500
> network 192.168.1.0
> !
> ip classless
>
> Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> 192.168.10.0/24 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 4 masks
> O 192.168.10.96/29 [110/65] via 192.168.2.1, 00:06:56, Serial1/0
> O 192.168.10.64/28 [110/65] via 192.168.2.1, 00:06:56, Serial1/0
> O 192.168.10.0/27 [110/65] via 192.168.2.1, 00:06:56, Serial1/0
> C 192.168.10.192/26 is directly connected, Loopback0
> C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
> C 192.168.2.0/24 is directly connected, Serial1/0
>
> ---------------------------------
>
> hostname R3_joe
> !
> ip subnet-zero
> !
> interface Ethernet0/0
> ip address 192.168.1.3 255.255.255.0
> !
> router igrp 1
> network 192.168.1.0
> !
> ip classless
>
> Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> I 192.168.10.0/24 [100/1600] via 192.168.1.2, 00:01:10, Ethernet0/0
> C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0
> I 192.168.2.0/24 [100/8576] via 192.168.1.2, 00:01:10, Ethernet0/0
>
> Thanks all,
> JOE
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave Gingrich" <Dave@dcg.org>
> To: "Joe Martin" <jmartin@gte.net>
> Cc: "Nnanna Obuba" <obuba@bellatlantic.net>; <wyan@ca.ibm.com>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 7:55 AM
> Subject: Re: OSPF Routing
>
>
> > At 07:05 5/4/00 -0700, Joe Martin wrote:
> > >That may be true, but from what I'm told for the CCIE lab is that NO
> STATIC
> > >ROUTES. This includes routes to null and any system generated routes.
> >
> > Not true. Static routes show up in the the routing table as type S, and
> > are manually entered with the IP ROUTE command. Routes due to OSPF
> summary
> > address statements are OSPF routes and are allowed under the "no static"
> > restriction. In fact, that is the point of the of the "no static"
> > restriction.
> > =========================
> > David C. Gingrich, K9DC
> > Indianapolis, Indiana
> > Dave@dcg.org
> > =========================
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:27 GMT-3