From: Joe Martin (jmartin@xxxxxxx)
Date: Fri May 05 2000 - 22:28:08 GMT-3
I have now had a chance to reload the routers, and all is still functioning.
I am running 12.1.1T, so this may be a REALLY new "feature". These are
3660's and I can't run very old software on them, so I have choosen to keep
up with the newest releases.
JOE
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan B" <rbenigno@home.com>
To: "Joe Martin" <jmartin@gte.net>; "Dave Gingrich" <Dave@dcg.org>
Cc: "Nnanna Obuba" <obuba@bellatlantic.net>; <wyan@ca.ibm.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2000 6:37 AM
Subject: Re: OSPF Routing
> Did you reload your routers yet?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joe Martin" <jmartin@gte.net>
> To: "Dave Gingrich" <Dave@dcg.org>
> Cc: "Nnanna Obuba" <obuba@bellatlantic.net>; <wyan@ca.ibm.com>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 6:02 PM
> Subject: Re: OSPF Routing
>
>
> > You are correct. I've just done the following test and shows that OSPF
> > *WILL* summarize out of its domain. Thanks for the correction. Nnanna,
I
> > didn't see the route to null that you said would be generated by the
> router.
> > Maybe a different version of code thing?
> >
> > hostname R1_joe
> > !
> > ip subnet-zero
> > !
> > interface Loopback0
> > ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.224
> > ip ospf network point-to-point
> > !
> > interface Loopback1
> > ip address 192.168.10.65 255.255.255.240
> > ip ospf network point-to-point
> > !
> > interface Loopback2
> > ip address 192.168.10.97 255.255.255.248
> > ip ospf network point-to-point
> > !
> > interface Serial1/0
> > ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
> > no fair-queue
> > !
> > router ospf 1
> > network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0
> > !
> > ip classless
> >
> > Gateway of last resort is not set
> >
> > 192.168.10.0/24 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 4 masks
> > C 192.168.10.96/29 is directly connected, Loopback2
> > C 192.168.10.64/28 is directly connected, Loopback1
> > C 192.168.10.0/27 is directly connected, Loopback0
> > O 192.168.10.192/26 [110/65] via 192.168.2.2, 00:05:03, Serial1/0
> > C 192.168.2.0/24 is directly connected, Serial1/0
> >
> > ----------------------------------
> >
> > hostname R2_joe
> > !
> > ip subnet-zero
> > !
> > interface Loopback0
> > ip address 192.168.10.254 255.255.255.192
> > ip ospf network point-to-point
> > !
> > interface FastEthernet0/0
> > ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0
> > duplex auto
> > speed auto
> > !
> > interface Serial1/0
> > ip address 192.168.2.2 255.255.255.0
> > no fair-queue
> > !
> > router ospf 1
> > summary-address 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0
> > network 192.168.2.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
> > network 192.168.10.254 0.0.0.0 area 0
> > !
> > router igrp 1
> > redistribute ospf 1 metric 64000 20000 1 255 1500
> > network 192.168.1.0
> > !
> > ip classless
> >
> > Gateway of last resort is not set
> >
> > 192.168.10.0/24 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 4 masks
> > O 192.168.10.96/29 [110/65] via 192.168.2.1, 00:06:56, Serial1/0
> > O 192.168.10.64/28 [110/65] via 192.168.2.1, 00:06:56, Serial1/0
> > O 192.168.10.0/27 [110/65] via 192.168.2.1, 00:06:56, Serial1/0
> > C 192.168.10.192/26 is directly connected, Loopback0
> > C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
> > C 192.168.2.0/24 is directly connected, Serial1/0
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> >
> > hostname R3_joe
> > !
> > ip subnet-zero
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0/0
> > ip address 192.168.1.3 255.255.255.0
> > !
> > router igrp 1
> > network 192.168.1.0
> > !
> > ip classless
> >
> > Gateway of last resort is not set
> >
> > I 192.168.10.0/24 [100/1600] via 192.168.1.2, 00:01:10, Ethernet0/0
> > C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0
> > I 192.168.2.0/24 [100/8576] via 192.168.1.2, 00:01:10, Ethernet0/0
> >
> > Thanks all,
> > JOE
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dave Gingrich" <Dave@dcg.org>
> > To: "Joe Martin" <jmartin@gte.net>
> > Cc: "Nnanna Obuba" <obuba@bellatlantic.net>; <wyan@ca.ibm.com>;
> > <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 7:55 AM
> > Subject: Re: OSPF Routing
> >
> >
> > > At 07:05 5/4/00 -0700, Joe Martin wrote:
> > > >That may be true, but from what I'm told for the CCIE lab is that NO
> > STATIC
> > > >ROUTES. This includes routes to null and any system generated
routes.
> > >
> > > Not true. Static routes show up in the the routing table as type S,
and
> > > are manually entered with the IP ROUTE command. Routes due to OSPF
> > summary
> > > address statements are OSPF routes and are allowed under the "no
static"
> > > restriction. In fact, that is the point of the of the "no static"
> > > restriction.
> > > =========================
> > > David C. Gingrich, K9DC
> > > Indianapolis, Indiana
> > > Dave@dcg.org
> > > =========================
> > >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:27 GMT-3